I wrote much of this rant many months ago, but it never seemed quite right, so I stored it away and never published it. I had an email the other day that convinced me to dust the cobwebs off it and publish it. It was from a doc several years out of residency whose medical school was paid for by the military looking for general financial advice. I was surprised to see that he still had a negative net worth. The main reason was that his family “owned” a 2011 car on which $30K was still owed and a 2012 car on which $29K was owed. There was a little bit of educational debt, and some retirement and non-retirement savings, but the liabilities far outweighed the assets, despite several years of attending-level compensation and no medical school debt. As you might imagine, I recommended he spend less and save more, starting with his choice of automobiles.
In the Millionaire Next Door, Stanley and Danko have an entire chapter entitled “You Aren’t What You Drive.” They note that only 23.5% of millionaires own a car from the current model year. In fact, 55% of millionaires own a car older than 2 years old. Most doctors aren’t even millionaires. In fact, a large percentage of doctors in their 30s still have a negative net worth. If most millionaires don’t drive new cars, why should a doctor? Stanley and Danko write about what buying habits among used-car buyers reveal:
What factors explain variation in wealth accumulation? Income is a factor. People with higher incomes are expected to have higher levels of wealth. But note again that members of this group of used-vehicle buyers have a significantly lower income than the average for the other groups of millionaires….Occupation is another factor. We have noted many times that entrepreneurs account for a disproportionately large share of the millionaires in America. Conversely, most of the other high-income-producing occupations contain disproportionately smaller portions of high-net worth types. These include physicians…dentists….attorneys….
Being frugal is a major reason members of the used vehicle-prone group are wealthy. Being frugal provides them with a dollar base to invest. In fact, they invest a significantly larger portion of their annual income than do any of the other types of vehicle buyers…the used vehicle-prone shopper group also contains the highest percentage of prodigious accumulators of wealth [those with a high net worth to income ratio.]
The majority of people do not have the ability to increase their incomes significantly. Yet income is a positive correlate of wealth. What then is our message? If you cannot increase your compensation significantly, become wealthy some other way. Do it defensively….They successfully innoculated themselves from contracting the high-consumption lifestyle that many of their neighbors adopted. More than 70 percent of their neighbors earn as much or more than they earn. But fewer than 50 percent of their neighbors have a net worth of $1 million or more.
How much can you save? Consider this. Physician A buys a $30,000 car. He drives it for 3 years, then sells it for $15,000 and repeats the process. He will also pay more in sales taxes, registration fees, insurance, possibly maintenance, and most likely finance charges. I’d estimate his cost of ownership at $7000 per year. Physician B buys a $3000 car. He drives it until it dies after 10 years. Then he buys another one. He paid cash for it (no sales tax), didn’t fix any of the little things, and paid minimal registration fees and insurance (liability only.) I’d estimate his cost of ownership at $800 per year. After 30 years, what is the difference between spending $800 a year on transportation versus $7000? Invest the difference at 8% and you’ll get $702,000. Yes, you read that right. Is driving a new car worth $700K to you? Most Americans retire with far less than $700K. Multiply that by two, or even three cars, and you’ll quickly realize the sum of money available to the frugal driver. The example might be a little extreme, but run your own numbers and see what you get. I’m convinced that many Americans are kept in the poorhouse simply because of their automobile choices. No consumption item, except a house, will make as much of a difference in your accumulation of wealth.
Now I realize full well that I’m a bit of an extremist on this subject. My parents have only bought two brand new cars in their entire life, and neither was bought during the 18 years I lived at home. I rode in beaters and I drove beaters, including a true Flintstone-Mobile due to a rusted out floor. But they were able to raise 6 kids, own an airplane, and retire early on a middle class income.
I learned early on that you’re not what you drive (although I confess that in high school I was jealous of those guys with the jacked up little Toyota pick-ups.) In fact, my “first car” was an old Geo Prizm my parents sold to me for $3K as a college senior. I was just happy to get an interest-free loan from them. Prior to that time I rode a bike or got a ride, so this was a huge upgrade.
I sold it after 2 years for $2100 and we got another one for $6K. I totalled it after 3 years, and the insurance company gave us $5500, which we put toward the next car.
My third car cost $8K. It was totalled after about 3 years and we got about $7K for it from the insurance company. Before it was wrecked we bought a second car for $1850, which was sold 4 years later for $1500. We took the insurance money from the totalled car, and added it to our savings to buy the car we really wanted, which we bought 3 years old for $18,900 and are still driving.
Most recently, I bought a car a couple of years ago for $4350. According to the blue book, I could sell it today for $6000. As you might guess, I got a great deal on most of these cars, but even if you just pay the sticker price at a used car lot, you’re still going to be far better off than getting a deal on a brand new one.
Initially, I thought I was just saving money now so I could drive whatever I want to drive later. After a few years driving beaters, I’ve realized I no longer care what I drive around in as long as it runs well, is comfortable to sit in, and can carry what I need to carry and pull what I need to pull. I do like driving the $20K car better than the $5K car, but not 4 times better. I probably won’t buy any more cars that cost less than $10K. I simply no longer need to. I’m 6 years out of residency, have no non-mortgage debt, have got a good chunk of equity in my home and rental property, have started college savings for the kids and have a portfolio on track to allow an early retirement. Can you say the same? Then what’s with the Lexus you share with the bank in your driveway? I’d much rather have the ability to walk into a Lexus dealership and pay cash for a brand-new, top-of-the-line Lexus than actually have one in the driveway.
Some complain that they can’t drive an inexpensive used car because they need something reliable. I just don’t buy it. I haven’t commuted in a car with less than 100K miles….ever. I’ve had to get a jump once on a cold morning after a night shift. Replaced the battery that afternoon. That’s it. Even if you add on the cost of a AAA membership, you’re still not going to get anywhere near the cost of driving new cars. Others worry about the cost of repairs on older vehicles. It’s a rare car repair (not a collision) that costs more than $1000-2000. Most are a few hundred dollars. It doesn’t take long to pay for that when you don’t have a $500 a month car payment. Even if you insist on having one nice car for road trips and driving the kids around, you can still buy a cheap commuter and save thousands. Who says your car has to be as nice as your spouse’s?
In the end, spend your money on what makes you happy. Do you need to drive $3K cars to be financially successful as a physician? Certainly not. But you do need to save and invest 20% of your income a year. If you can’t do that AND buy an expensive car then you’d best line up your habits with your true priorities. Just keep repeating “You aren’t what you drive….you aren’t what you drive” until you believe it.