
There's no doubt that kids are expensive. In 2017, the US Department of Agriculture estimated that it cost an average of $233,000 to raise a child to 18, and I'm sure it's significantly higher now, probably topping $300,000. One of those children is certainly affordable in most doctor families. But if you have four, six, or 13 kids like some of the people in my neighborhood, that total cost may be more than your eventual retirement nest egg! Babies are expensive, but many parents are surprised to learn that kids don't become LESS expensive as they grow; they become MORE expensive.
More information on this topic:
- The Hidden Costs of a Dual Income Household
- Stay-at-Home Dads and Your Finances
- Avoiding the Second Income Trap with a Side Gig for the Stay-at-Home Spouse
- Childcare for Doctors and the Cost of Daycare Options
- Single-Income vs. Dual-Income Families
Still, a big part of the initial sticker shock of children is childcare. Childcare can be a major expense for many families, even high-income families like white coat investors. But there are a number of options available when it comes to childcare.
Child-Free Life
Whether “casados” (married), “juntados” (together), or “solteros” (single), one way to minimize your childcare expenses is simply to not have children at all. With modern methods of birth control, “accidents” don't happen nearly as often as in the past. While some people are childless against their wishes, an ever-growing percentage of people are simply deciding NOT to have any children for various reasons—including a career focus, environmental worries, genetic concerns, mental illness, and a simple lack of desire to raise children. Who can blame them when a significant amount of research indicates that children put stress on marriages and significantly decrease happiness (at least in the short term)? As The Atlantic writes:
“And children can turn a cheerful and loving romantic partnership into a zero-sum battle over who gets to sleep and work and who doesn’t. As Jennifer Senior notes in her book, All Joy and No Fun, children provoke a couple’s most frequent arguments—“more than money, more than work, more than in-laws, more than annoying personal habits, communication styles, leisure activities, commitment issues, bothersome friends, sex.” Someone who doesn’t understand this is welcome to spend a full day with an angry 2-year-old (or a sullen 15-year-old); they’ll find out what she means soon enough.”
Stay-at-Home Parent
Many couples opt for the traditional route, having a parent stay home. Traditionally this has been the mother, which makes sense given her unique biological ability to breastfeed, but stay-at-home fathers are becoming more and more common all the time. The rate of stay-at-home parents being men has increased from 11% in 1989 to 18% in 2021.
Typically, a stay-at-home parent takes on the primary child-raising role as well as other tasks like housekeeping, food preparation, shopping, laundry, the care of elderly parents, and the supervision of schooling. Each of these has a significant economic benefit to the family, such that many couples opt to purchase life insurance for the breadwinner AND the homemaker. The only cost is the loss of a second income (although it may also decrease future income for that parent), but once a family takes into consideration the additional value provided at home, the saved childcare expenses, additional work expenses, and taxation, that cost may not be very high at all and can even be negative. There is also the possibility, ever more common these days, that the stay-at-home parent can do some paid work from home (part-time telemedicine, perhaps?) while balancing other responsibilities.
After our eldest was born, Katie left her teaching job and became a stay-at-home parent for many years until she started working for WCI. We credit that decision for many of the successes we've had in life—not only in our family but in my clinical career and with The White Coat Investor. While many in society deride this setup as “trad-wifing,” I think it's important to remember that not all change is progress. There is often a reason that traditional practices became traditional in the first place.
School
Perhaps the most common childcare option used by American families today is school. Plenty of stay-at-home parents go back to work when their youngest turns 5 or 6. When I was a kid—and until recently in the area where we now live—the most common option for kindergarten was for a half-day. That doesn't do a lot in the way of childcare for a family with two full-time earners. Full-day kindergarten is the norm now and, increasingly, for preschool. Preschool used to be just for 4-year-olds. Then, for 3-year-olds. And now sometimes it's even for 2-year-olds! This can be really expensive in some areas of the country—as much as $40,000 per year per child. That is still mindboggling to me, but I guess when you're comparing it to the cost of childcare, maybe it's really not all that much (and you get a little education thrown in to boot!). At any rate, if your children are going to public schools, your childcare expenses should drop dramatically when they enter kindergarten, whether the cost you were paying is called childcare or preschool.
Traditional Childcare
Hiring someone to watch your child is a commonly used option for single parents and dual-income families alike. Care.com does a cost of care report each year, and for 2024, it reported that childcare costs are basically unaffordable for most families. Here are the numbers:
Those are weekly costs, but they add up to about $1,300 a month or almost $16,000 per year per child. The average second child discount is only about 10%, and heaven forbid you have three that need childcare at once. The US Department of Health and Human Services says a family can afford to spend 7% of their income on childcare and still be OK, but the Care.com survey respondents are spending 24% on average and 1/3 of respondents aren't even paying for it from current income. They're having to dip into their savings to pay for childcare. Even on a typical physician income of $300,000-$400,000, $30,000 a year in childcare (two kids) is beyond the HHS recommendation. Single parenting is tough at any income!
Note the “family care center” line in the survey. I believe this refers to in-home (not your home) daycares. These are often cheaper, but the quality is likely a bit more variable, too.
Nanny
Traditional daycare doesn't work for many docs, particularly shift workers and those with lots of call. The daycare isn't open at 10pm when the ED calls you to pull someone's poorly chewed steak out of their esophagus, when the labor deck calls to tell you it's time, or when the trauma pager goes off. Most daycares don't open until 8am, close at 5:30 pm, and don't open on federal holidays. You're going to need something a whole lot more flexible. That may take the form of a nanny or an au pair. As you can see in the chart above, nannies cost 2-3 times as much as a daycare. Your child probably gets a lot more personalized care, but it comes at a price that might cost $755 per week x 52 weeks = $39,260. You could save some money with an au pair, but you're still looking at at least half that cost.
Don't forget that you're going to need to file a Schedule H and withhold payroll taxes for your household employee. You may also need another car for your nanny or au pair so they can drive your kids around.
Live-in Family
Some families look at prices like that and figure they'd be better off supporting another family member—maybe a mother, a cousin, or a little sister. You could spend $40,000 a year on that person and still break even with hiring a nanny—and hopefully, the family member does an even better job than the nanny would. Plus, it often kills two birds with one stone in that both your kid and the family member get taken care of.
Help from Those Who Surround You
This is just cobbling together neighbors, friends, and family to watch the kid. In residency, only two people in our class had kids, and the other resident's wife worked as an ICU nurse. But you know who was available to take care of little Claire when they had overlapping shifts? Katie (and occasionally I) was. As many parents know, it's often easier to care for two kids than one. Maybe it's one neighbor before school, one neighbor after school, your sister on Memorial Day, and your mother-in-law next Saturday, but you work it all out. The price is right, but the hassle factor is high both for you and those who care about you and your kid.
Ships in the Night
There is another option, surprisingly frequently employed. I call it the “ships in the night” option. This is where one parent works days and the other parent works evenings, nights, or weekends. They don't see each other much during the week (like ships passing in the night), but there's always someone around to take care of the kid. The tricky part is finding time for everybody to sleep. With two sleep-deprived parents, it's no wonder kids lower your happiness level!
Wait Lists
Daycares aren't groceries. You can't just go down to the local Kroger and pick one up. That Care.com survey mentions that 65% have spent time on a daycare center waitlist with 81% juggling multiple waitlists simultaneously and 43% waiting four months or longer. Don't delay finding daycare; it may take your entire parental leave period or more to line it up.
HCOLAs
Unfortunately, the numbers in that chart above are the averages. As many docs know, daycare costs a whole lot more if they live in California or New York City. Massachusetts won in a recent survey, with an average cost of nearly $21,000 for out-of-home daycare, about 64% more than tuition at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. It's not getting cheaper either, with daycare inflation running much higher than many other costs, as shown by Business Insider.
Government Programs May Help
There are a number of government programs that can help, but they're highly variable by state and city. In Portland, for example, a tax on the wealthiest folks was implemented in 2020 to provide 6-10 hours a day of “free” daycare for everybody else. As a doc or other high-income professional, I'm not sure you're coming out ahead there, but as long as you're paying for it, you might as well take advantage of it. The Childcare Development Block Grant is federal money given to states to help pay for childcare, and it's implemented in different ways in different states.
The Child Care Tax Credit
The most significant form of government help is the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit. This is mostly for kids under 13, but those who are older but can't care for themselves still qualify. You only get the credit if you actually pay expenses for childcare, but note that preschool counts. Basically, you can claim 20%-35% (20% for most white coat investors) of your daycare expenses up to a total of $3,000 ($6,000 for two kids). As a high earner, if you spent $15,000 on daycare for your kid, you get $1,200 of it back as a tax credit. The credit can actually be refundable for some people. There is no income phaseout, which is nice. This is all claimed on IRS Form 2441:
It's a two-page form, but it looks pretty straightforward to me.
Children are expensive. Paid childcare is particularly expensive, especially for those who cannot use a traditional daycare option. It can still make sense for high earners to remain in the workforce and pay for it, but plan ahead and take advantage of every bit of assistance you can find from friends, family, and the government to help.
What do you think? What childcare options have you chosen to use and why? If you have adult children, how much do you think it cost to raise them?
My partner and I don’t have children by choice, so cost of childcare isn’t something I’m very familiar with. My jaw dropped when I saw that graph illustrating how childcare costs rose by 800% since the 80s. No wonder more folks are choosing not to have kids these days. I wonder if this “daycare inflation” is partly due to private equity buying out daycares?
Not sure of all the factors behind it.
I am very grateful my family is in a position for my wife to stay home. Not only financially, but also scheduling, she wants to, etc. I don’t know how two working parents have any time for themselves, each other, and to raise kids. Seems like a constant state of survival mode which I have tried to avoid. I have non-medical family with two working parents and 3 kids, daycare is another (large) mortgage. I’m not envious of two working physicians either despite the presumably high income. Very hard to balance 2 career building paths and raise kids.
My wife worked for over 10 years as a nurse and now has moved onto her second career which is raising kids and running our house. I don’t feel like we encounter too much judgement from the dual working folks from a women’s “progress” standpoint. That said, the “must be nice” kind of comments you (particularly the stay at home parent) get sometimes can be kind of annoying. 1. Yes it is nice, that’s why we have made deliberate decisions in our life to do this. We choose to make our lives as good as we can. It hasn’t been an accident and we don’t have a trust fund. 2. Few understand how hard staying home with young kids is. There’s a lot of positive psychological feedback you get working that just doesn’t happen when you stay home. Whether that’s adult socialization or just small feelings of accomplishment throughout a day.
Thanks for sharing your experience. Interesting that it seems so rare these days.
Great article, my wife and I recently navigated this and settled on a (great) nanny for the flexibility. Care.com infamously low-balls salaries though – in the two large cities we’ve lived in recently starting hourly rate for less experienced nannies is about 30% higher – and if you need more than 40 hours a week then those extra hours are paid at 1.5x – and there’s another ~12% cost for the employer portion of state / federal taxes. As you note, daycares in high cost of living areas aren’t much better though, and incredibly inflexible to variable hospital schedules.
Having a kid was one of the best decisions we’ve ever made though, even if it wasn’t financially!
The world keeps getting worse and worse (climate, politics, wars, mental health, gun violence, crime, societal ills)….that’s another reason not to have kids…..they are being unfairly burdened. However we run into the dilemma of who will care for you in your old age….have people who don’t have kids thought about that. I think even if you live in a nursing home, you still need family to make sure you are treated ok and not being taken advantage of. Sorry if this is off topic!
The answer is yes, we have thought about that. Having kids is no guarantee they’ll take care of you as you age. My guess is that the percentage of elders who have children living close enough who are willing to help and aren’t too busy with their own lives is not huge. Us not having kids means we have the time and energy and money to help our parents out quite a bit, but if we did have kids, or if we lived across the country instead of nearby, that help would be *much* more limited. It’s a crapshoot regardless; “but who will take care of you” isn’t a good reason to have kids if you’re otherwise ambivalent. If that’s your main motivation, it’s putting a lot on the kid(s), too; if you’re counting on that help and their dream is to do a job that requires living far away from you, do you guilt them into staying put near you instead?
I never thought we would be able to send our kids to traditional daycare with 2 full-time physician schedules — but we have been lucky that we both have just enough flexibility that it has worked out. Full-time daycare for 2 kids represents <5% of our gross monthly income. We are in a VHCOLA and a nanny would be about triple the cost.
I'm not sure what will happen once they are school age and have more activities but I agree that I certainly don't expect things to get any cheaper.
With 2 doctors for us it makes the most sense to both be working full time with little kids. A few reasons for this. One is that neither of us feel that after a decade of training and only a few short years with our "real" jobs that we are ready to go to one or both reduced schedules — especially because both of us are in surgical fields where you need to keep the volume up to keep your skills up. Another financial reason is that I feel that since we missed out on a decade of investing and compounding because of school and training that these early years are the most important for frontloading our investing and plowing money into retirement savings to catch up. I feel that this is very achieveable for us with 2 physician incomes and we certainly invest far more each month than we pay for childcare.
I would be interested to hear about more “high end” childcare options for dual-income families. A family of two surgeons working 70+ hrs/wk each, with odd and unpredictable schedules, but who want to have kids, are going to need help close to 24/7. Whether that comes in the form of a live-in nanny, contract with an agency, au pair, etc I do not know. They basically need to rent the services of a traditional stay-at-home parent. My family doesn’t have quite that level of schedule demand, nor that level of income, but our patchwork of part-time nannies is a nightmare to coordinate. It would be nice to explore more seamless options, even if the cost is higher.
We are a dual physician couple but usually only work ~40 hours per week to be honest. I also just dropped down to 0.8 FTE so will be 4 days per week. We have a lot of redundancy in our childcare plan which is expensive but so worth it to us. We have a full time nanny who usually gets paid for 40-45 hours per week at $23/hour (even if she works less she gets 40 hours), my oldest is in private kindergarten and my toddler goes to a “pre-school” 3 days/ week for 6 hours. There’s also an infant at home w the nanny or me on my day off. So we basically end up paying for 60 hours of childcare per week when we only use 40-45 most weeks. But this is crucial when a kid is sick so we don’t have to cancel our patients, etc. Also the nanny helps w laundry, dishes, tidying up, etc which is SO wonderful to come home to at the end of the day. We also both sometimes use childcare hours for personal things like working out, or errands that are easier done without kids like running to the grocery store. Personally I feel like this set up makes my life quite a bit easier than my friends who are stay at home parents. Probably it makes my husbands a little harder than if I stayed home and took care of all of the housework bc he does his own laundry, cooks some, helps w dishes, kids stuff, etc. But he also appreciates that my income makes a difference in our lifestyle and helps to support his expensive watch habit. We have 3 girls so I also think he appreciates the example I’m setting for them.
Thanks for sharing your story and situation. Super helpful for others.
Chris,
My situation isn’t exactly what you described, but my family does have extensive experience with au pairs. My wife worked as a regional director for an au pair agency before we married. She chose to stay at home once our first child was born, and we have continuously hosted au pairs since he was six months old. We now have three children who have grown up with au pairs in our home over the past ten years.
While we have primarily utilized them to assist my wife, I have friends who are in the situation you discussed. As married ER docs, they have highly variable schedules and need the flexibility that a live-in au pair provides. However, it is not a panacea. The au pair culture exchange program is governed by the US Department of State and has specific guidelines and restrictions.
For more information, I wrote “Au Pair: French for Inexpensive Childcare?” about our experience. https://businessisthebestmedicine.com/au-pair-french-for-inexpensive-childcare/
Neill
Thanks. Unfortunately in my family, my wife is not supportive of the au pair option. Her concerns are (1) limited hours, (2) getting a teenager who is not good taking care of children, (3) getting a teenager who will get into teenager trouble, and (4) having someone else living in the house. She grew up in a (first-world) foreign country and there are many au pairs available in that country who speak the native language that she sometimes speaks with our children, which I see as a potential benefit. I think all her concerns are valid but we do not agree on the overall cost/benefit trade-off.
I more had in mind some kind of staffing agency that specializes in high-end childcare/home management. I’m thinking like, give them the kids’ school and activity schedule and they manage it completely, taking them everywhere they need to go, even putting them to bed and staying overnight if the parents are working night shifts. Planned activities with them on the weekends. Meals on the table at certain times of day, every day. Open the closet, full of clean clothes. Open the fridge, stocked with groceries. House straightened up daily and cleaned regularly. All without asking or pre-arranging. I know it sounds like a lot, but my MIL did this list of tasks every day for 30 years (God bless her). My FIL had an executive job and was gone constantly – no night shifts, but lots of travel. I know people who have these types of jobs, and it makes me wonder what parents who both have jobs like this do for childcare/housework. Our family doesn’t need quite this level of coverage – I work normal-ish hours with occasional travel and my wife works only a few night shifts, but lots of nights and weekends. It would just be nice to have help that was more consistent and centralized. Maybe this hypothetical agency has a budget option. I live in a major city with lots of executive-types who probably need or want this care so someone must be providing it. I’m not sure an au pair could work enough hours to cover us just because of the low overlap in our work schedules. Cost is also an issue but at this point I’d be willing to cut back on savings to buy a better lifestyle.
I haven’t heard of an agency like what you’re proposing, and I pay attention to a lot of working parent type content. It sounds like what you’re looking for is a full time nanny who is open to doing overnights, at least part time home manager to help with kid logistics, meal planning, groceries, stocking toilet paper etc., and probably an extra weekend babysitter or two. Also probably a cleaning service. Still will require a fair amount of coordination and planning on you and partner’s part. I don’t think many dual income families achieve a set it and forget it system for very long at a time, unfortunately.
Sounds like 2-3 full time jobs as you describe it! Pretty expensive.
Chris what you are describing exists but will cost you a pretty penny. If you live in at least a moderately large city there is likely a nanny agency in town that has the hook up. The title for what you are looking for is “live in household manager”. Cost seemed to be about 1.5-1.75x nanny rate with “free rent”. My wife is Er and I’m anesthesia we have full time nanny but not live in. 25/hr. Outside of her vacation, I schedule her whenever we need at any time of day. To do this you have to guarantee their hours(35-40). So when we go on vacation we still have to pay her.
Thanks for sharing!
It’s frighteningly expensive and the costs are really hard to avoid.
In the DC area – school (Goddard) – is 3200/month for daycare (my son is 21 months).
Our nanny is 21/hour (min 30 hours a week) – 3000/month
We’re having our second kid in November, given that we’re both ER docs with a toddler we are getting a night nurse – 35/hour – 6500ish/month (depending on if you do 7 days, versus 5, versus 3).
The plan is when my son turns 3 – put him in a catholic pre-k that is 1k/month.
Then have the same number of hours for the nanny (3k/month) until our new kid is old enough to go to pre-k (he/she doesnt get to go to school), and my wife will try to work around those hours.
We’re also anti-AuPairs because we dont want someone living in my house and they are still limited to 40hours a week so it’s not like you’re really getting thaat much more than our 21/hour nanny, but it is more flexible.
Thankfully we’ve been blog followers forever and our expenses are really low so it’s managable albeit painful.
Good luck!
I think your interpretation of The Child Care Tax Credit is incorrect. Line 5=$6,000 maximum for up to two kids. At income >43k, your maximum tax credit is 6,000*0.20=$1200. You can’t get $3,000 for 15,000 daycare expenses as you suggest.
In addition, it may be helpful to note that MFS does not qualify for this credit.
Since my spouse and I have federal student loans, we calculate the tax difference between MFS and MFJ and the years student loan payment difference and go with the better one.
I didn’t remember getting this credit and just looked. We had to fill out form 2441 for our dependent care FSA but did not qualify for any credits due to MFS.
Wouldn’t surprise me if you’re right and I’m mistaken. We’ve never claimed this credit ourselves. But let’s take a look:
I agree max on line 6 (not 5) is 6,000 because that’s the max on line 3.But I think you’re right that your max is $1,200 as a higher earner. Thanks for the correction.
Via email:
Great article. Loved it.
NPR did an interesting podcast on daycare economics and made the case for government subsidization, if you are interested.
https://www.npr.org/2023/02/02/1153931108/day-care-market-expensive-child-care-waitlists
Thanks for the excellent post,
Via email:
Au pair! $9-10k upfront, ~$200 per week plus room and board (meals, car insurance, cell phone, maintenance of a 3rd car if needed etc). Comes to roughly $25k but with three young kids, no family nearby, none in elementary school yet, and two full time physician parents, it was a no brainer for our family!