[Editor's Note: Today's guest post was submitted by Matt Elliott, CFP®, CSLP® of Pulse Financial Planning. Pulse is a fee-only fiduciary and one of our WCI Recommended Financial Advisors. I'm still puzzled when I see members of our WCI community actively trying to time market lows or buy out of favor individual stocks (think cruise lines) for the classic reasons discussed below. I'll see if Matt can convince you today that this is a losing strategy.]
As a financial planner, by far the most common questions I get are:
- My investments are down, should I get out of the market?
- Stocks are down recently, is now a good opportunity to get into the market?
- I heard XYZ is going to be a hot stock, should I buy it?
- I heard XYZ event may cause a downturn in the stock market, should I sell now?
These questions ramp up during times of market volatility when investors are looking to buy stocks “on sale” or avoid further losses in their portfolio.
However, this is really just the same question asked in different ways though, which is:
Should I attempt to time the stock market?
I’ll be up front here: No, you shouldn’t try to time the market. I’ll explain why through the 4 questions that inevitably follow when I explain this.
#1 Why should I not try to time the market?
Reason 1: It is incredibly difficult to do consistently over the long term.
Time and time again, studies show that professionally actively managed portfolios do worse than a diversified buy and hold strategy. To make matters worse, actively managed portfolios have higher costs, which only exacerbates the underperformance as was shown in this report from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
Remember that these are experts that are unable to beat market returns by attempting to time the stock market. If you are an individual investor without a background in finance and powerful technology at your disposal, you are at an even further disadvantage. I can attest first-hand that I’ve seen hundreds of individual investors attempt to do this over the years, and I’ve never seen it go well in the long run.
Reason 2: It costs more.
Depending on what you are trading, and where, you may run into transaction costs each time you make a change. If you are using ETFs, you also have to deal with the “spread” (difference between the bid and ask price) each time you buy and sell. That liquidity cost can add up in the long run, particularly on larger trades. If you are using mutual funds, many have additional short-term redemption fees you will be charged if you don’t hold onto the fund long enough.
Reason 3: It is not tax efficient.
In a taxable account, you will have short term holdings, which are taxed at a higher rate than anything held longer than a year. Tax brackets change year to year, but most Americans pay 15% in long-term capital gains taxes. This number can be as high as 20% for high-income households, but also can be as low as 0% if your income is below a certain threshold. Short-term capital gains are taxed at your ordinary income rate – which is always going to be higher than the flat long-term capital gains rates.
Actively managing your portfolio also makes taking advantage of other tax planning strategies such as tax-loss harvesting more difficult. When you’re trading based on speculation of where investments will go in the future, you may be unable to trade based on what you know would be good for your tax bill next year if the two strategies differ. This adds unnecessary complexity to your portfolio.
You will also have to pay tax on your gains as soon as you sell the investment, rather than being able to take advantage of deferring your tax bill into the future. In fact, you may never have to pay taxes at all on your investment gains if they pass to your beneficiaries or you donate the appreciated shares to charity in the future.
Reason 4: It takes more time and creates more stress.
I don’t know about you, but I’d rather spend my time on other things than reading Yahoo Finance articles at 2 am. That might be a worthwhile activity if it worked, but we already discussed that studies consistently demonstrate that you are more likely to make a poor investment than a good one by attempting to predict future stock prices.
We have so many decisions as it is, complicated trading strategies that are unlikely to work only add stress to our already hectic lives. When you try to time the stock market, you actually have to be right twice for it to pay off. You have to be right about the time to buy, and then again when you sell.
One example of this that stands out in my mind is an old client that got out of the stock market just as things started to turn south during the 2008 financial crisis. That could have turned out to be a very fortunate decision, however they never got back into the market. Every time I spoke with the person over the years, the answer was the same – “I just think the market is going to take another dive then I’ll jump back in”. I can’t imagine how painful it was each time they saw the stock market hitting all-time highs for the next ten years, yet felt handcuffed by all of the gains they already missed out on. The result was a decade of missed opportunity, and a far worse result than had they weathered the storm and stuck to an investing plan in the first place.
#2 If timing the stock market weren’t possible, why was my neighbor (or friend, in-law, CNBC talking head, etc.) able to do it?
I don’t think humans will ever stop using anti-aging creams, weight loss pills, or stop gambling. It’s in our nature to seek shortcuts. Doing things the right way can be hard, boring, require discipline and take time. That doesn’t mean you should buy a lottery ticket and diet pills as the solution to your health and money problems.
One reason people continue to try to time the stock market is due to overconfidence (or optimism) bias. In an episode of “100 Humans” on Netflix recently, panelists asked a group of 100 people to raise their hand if they think they are smarter than the average human in the group. 80 people raised their hands (God bless the hearts of the 20 that didn’t).
We know only 50 of the people can really be “above average”. What is happening here is a classic example of overconfidence bias – we think our ability is higher than it actually is. The same bias exists with our own belief of our driving ability, athleticism, and yes – our investing. This can lead to investing too much in risky investments which we know little about without even realizing it.
#3 I think I’m right in this case anyway, why not trust my gut?
The problem is that the less we know about something, the more confident we tend to be in our ability. This is known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, and I’ve seen people with little investing knowledge devastate their own financial futures by attempting to pick individual stocks (or bitcoin, options, futures, etc.) or time when to buy and sell the stock market.
If you are set on investing in individual stock picks or trying an active trading strategy, I recommend keeping this to less than 5% of your investable assets. That way you can scratch that itch and ensure that you’re not blowing up your financial future in the process. I call this a core (95% of investments in a diversified, disciplined plan) and explore (5% of investments in your individual picks) strategy.
Investing should be boring. It should take a long time. If you’re looking to your investments as a source of entertainment, I’d suggest a less expensive hobby. (Maybe pick up golf?)
#4 So what should we do with our investments then?
The first question to ask yourself is, should this money really be invested in the first place? Before investing you should:
- Make sure you have at least 3-6 months of expenses in your bank account. If you are in a job that is susceptible to recessions or your income is not stable, this number should be 6-12 months.
- Make sure you don’t plan to use this money for any short term goals such as a down payment or vacation within the next 5 years.
Once you know how much you have available to invest for the long term, you should create your investment strategy based on:
- Your time horizon (how long until you will use the money)
- Your risk tolerance (how much volatility can you handle in your investments)
- Your risk capacity (how much risk do you need to take to reach your goals)
Then you can begin implementing your investments:
- Consider your situation for the best account to invest in – a Roth IRA, your employer 401k through higher payroll deductions, a trust, or a taxable account.
- Diversify your investments across different asset classes based on your investment strategy.
- Rebalance your investments regularly to keep them on track. This builds in a disciplined, buy low, sell high process and ensures your investments don’t become too aggressive or too conservative over time.
The good news is, you don’t have to spend your energy worrying about when is the perfect time to buy and sell. You can simply set up a sustainable, disciplined plan. By sticking to it, you will be far better off than your neighbor (or co-worker, in-law or CNBC talking head).
What do you think? Are you trying to time the market or buy individual stocks (or did you in the past)? How has it worked out for you? Comment below!
A close relative of mine insists on picking stocks and frequently buying and selling individual stocks, holding them on average days to weeks, something she calls “short term investing.” I have tried to explain to her the downsides of this approach and the upsides of index funds, but she insists that she is beating the market, but cherry picks time periods since her last big loss. How do I convince her to get into smart investing?
The “Cherry Picking” example is another one I see frequently, unfortunately. This is also known as “Rationalization” or “Confirmation” bias and occurs when we give too much weight to evidence that supports a belief we already hold (and reject anything that may be contrary to our belief). In this case, the belief is “I’m a good trader and it makes me money”.
I had a client several years ago that was comparing how he did on his own stock picks verses his managed portfolio. At the end of the year he said “The whole market was down at the end of the year, and that threw off my results. The jury is still out on which portfolio did better, so I’m going to continue picking stocks.”
This is like going to a craps table and saying “I won $500! But I’m not counting the $1000 I lost when a 3 was rolled because the whole table lost”. You’d be shocked how often people rationalize things this way. They aren’t doing it intentionally, it is a trick our brains play to help us not feel the pain of being wrong.
Unfortunately, I don’t thing there is any one thing you can do to convince your family member to change her investing strategy. As you have seen, she has built in defense mechanisms to convince herself the strategy is working perfectly.
Rather than try to convince her, I would try to listen to her and ask questions.
“How does your trading strategy support your long term goals?”
“How do you systematically track successes and failures?”
“What are you doing to keep the tax bill down on all those gains?”
Remember to not ask questions in a confrontational way, (If she thinks you’re trying to just change her mind, those defenses will go up). Perhaps if she feels you are trying to understand her point of view, she will be more open to new ideas.
After all, you are dealing with the same type of bias that drives so much political polarization we see in the country today. It is no easy feat to change someone’s mind on a deeply held belief, but coming from a place of seeking to understand her point of view is a good place to start.
When the student is ready the teacher will appear. You might try giving her a book though “since I know you’re interested in investing.”
I am guilty of rebalancing in response to market changes and not just in early January like my written investing plan says I should. This is also a form of timing the market, and I probably shouldn’t do it. But they’re on sale! And I’m only rebalancing to get back to my written asset allocation. It makes me wonder if I am not taking enough risk, since my first impulse when things drop is to buy more.
It could be that a more aggressive portfolio may make sense for you if that is always your reaction. One thing to be careful of though is differentiating your “risk tolerance” and “risk capacity”. Risk tolerance is your personal attitude towards risk, while risk capacity is your financial ability to take risk given your time horizon and goals.
It is important to not exceed whichever is lower. For example, let’s assume a risk scale of 1-10 and your risk tolerance is a “10” but your risk capacity is a “7”. Your portfolio shouldn’t be more aggressive than a “7”, even if your instinct is to buy more when the market is down.
Likewise, if your risk capacity is a “10”, but your risk tolerance is only a “5”, your portfolio shouldn’t be more aggressive than a “5” to keep you from selling everything when the market is down.
I hope that makes sense and I wish you much financial success!
Probably a good indication. March was a pretty good indication of your risk tolerance.
Missed the boat – I bought the cruise lines when they were down 75% – priced for bankruptcy doubled my money in mere weeks. Buy now?….I mean maybe but alot has rebounded. Also, a statement ‘should I buy stocks’ is similar to ‘should I buy real estate’ – it depends. Some real estate has been hurt by COVID and some not – retail vs residential mid range rentals vs low end vs high end etc . I rent to healthcare workers mostly and haven’t lost a months rent across a dozen rentals. I know others that have been forced to seek other funding and change strategy because tenants have been skipping payments.
I would say one should be building cash to hunt for opportunity in the coming deflationary period. With fewer people working the velocity in the exchange of money will slow = deflation. Prices (in general) for most goods and services will fall. Caveat – I say most goods/services because scarcity will drive some goods and services higher.
Certainly interesting times.
Happy investing
JustSayin
Why aren’t you rich yet? You’re always stopping by to tell us about all these great picks and investments you’ve made. 🙂
As long as you’re making predictions, why not put a time line on them so we can see how cloudy your crystal ball is?
Agree. REcessions are deflationary but the ongoing addition of trillions of dollars to the money supply by the Fed is inflationary. Which will win? Who knows… Probably will vary by industry.
Great article and much easier to say than do. That is why I have this quote by Jack Bogle pinned up near my desk:
“But the stock pickers say they are better than average. They can earn their fees and more.”
Just how do you convince someone that has bought a stock, had it double, and then sold it that this is not a good idea?
Or people that see their accounts go up year after year in a 10-year bull market and think it is all about their stock picking when they can’t do the math to factor in all the money that was added from their paycheck along the way.
It is a tough battle to fight sometimes, so articles like this are refreshing.
Thanks,
Dave
“risk tolerance” is just another term for losing more money. Do not buy in to this line of rubbish often used by “financial advisors” who enrich themselves by charging you absurd fees for no return….remember “CASH” is also a strategy—and a powerful one…
Good article.
I know of little reason that a physician should not have any retirement savings.
Even if you start late in savings (based on medical school debt) as many of us do you can put more per month into an emergency fund and stocks/bonds as the debt is paid off.
As I retire out of the military I hope to work part time in medicine and I am currently starting my certified financial planner (CFP) certificate to be completed in 2021.
At that point it assists me with my own finances and allows me to give sound investment advise, for a fee, to those who choose my services.
if you like business, investing, etc it is a good degree with future potential outstanding in many work environments. In fact most current planners are over 70.
So just a bit of information for you.
Happy savings.
I invest in the company i believe in, for example, square is great company, they have great customer service and know they will always do well. Who doesn’t use amazon or apple products, so do the math and think where to invest.
I can’t think of a single company that will “always do well”. If your stock analysis consists solely of “Do lots of people use this company?” any success you have is likely luck, and it probably won’t last long. Lots of people use GE:
https://www.google.com/search?ei=JBQPX5xyka21Bqb7mrgD&q=GE+stock&oq=GE+stock&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIPCAAQsQMQgwEQQxBGEPoBMgoIABCxAxCDARBDMgUIABCxAzIICAAQsQMQgwEyBQgAELEDMgQIABBDMgcIABCxAxBDMgIIADICCAAyAggAUI0MWLkQYPMRaABwAHgAgAFyiAGKBZIBAzYuMZgBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXo&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwiclMqovc_qAhWRVs0KHaa9BjcQ4dUDCAw&uact=5
There are literally dozens/hundreds of other historical examples.
Picking winning stocks successfully over the long term is not easy. I’m not saying nobody can do it, but most people shouldn’t try, they should just buy them all.