A while back I posted about the concept of a safe withdrawal rate, the percentage which you can withdraw from your portfolio each year in retirement, adjusted for inflation, at which you shouldn’t run out of money before dying. Wade Pfau, a finance professor, published a paper this year in which he discussed the concept of a safe savings rate.
How Much Do I Need to Save for Retirement?
A reader recently posted a comment asking how much he needed to save each year in the accumulation stage of his life. Although the answer I am tempted to give is “as much as you can” (which is probably accurate from a behavioral perspective), from an academic and theoretical perspective, the answer is that it depends. But Professor Pfau’s paper nails it down about as well as one can.
The real meat of the paper is Table 1, which I’ve reproduced here.
Let’s look at the two extremes to get an idea of what the table is actually saying. First, if you only work and save for 20 years, then want to live in retirement for 40 years on 70% of the salary you were making when you were working, and you’re only willing to use a portfolio that is 40% stocks, then you need to save 66% of your income each year. On the other hand, if you’re willing to work for 40 years, have a retirement of 20 years, live off 50% of your final salary, and use an 80/20 portfolio, then you only need to save 6.3% of your salary.
There’s obviously a big difference between 6% and 66%. Most of us are probably somewhere in the middle. A more reasonable assumption is 30 years working, 30 years retired, live off 50% of final salary in retirement (remember you no longer have to pay as much in taxes or save for retirement and you’ll likely get something from social security) and use a more standard 60/40 portfolio. This reveals you need a savings rate of 17%. Now that’s off your gross income.
My Safe Savings Rate Recommendation
This is the basis for my usual recommendation to save 15-20% of your income. 10% probably isn’t enough. 25-30% is for those who want to retire early. If you want to retire really early (before 50), you’d better be pretty darn thrifty both before and after retirement. Even with only living off 50% of your salary (remember social security won’t kick in for a decade or more after you retire) and investing aggressively, you’ll still need to save over 1/3 of your income during your working years.
Hi WCI,
I am having difficulty achieving “critical mass”. I graduated fellowship in 2010, work as a cardiologist in the metro NYC area and have tried to follow the guidelines here and at bogleheads but don’t feel like I’m making a lot of progress.
The first two years after fellowship, I was not able to save much after paying off debts and we also had a child. In years 2012 and 2013, I was able to save about 23% of my income both years. But I feel like I am undersaving since my income last year was $368K and my savings percentage should have been higher.
This year, I am fortunate that my income will be about $450K (and it will not rise more than that in the future) but my savings percentage rate will still be around 23-24%.
(I am saving part of the increase in income but part of it also goes to the mortgage which almost increased my housing costs by 50%).
In terms of pure percentages, this is how I break down my spending roughly:
22-24% (savings which means 403B 457B and taxable)
32-35% (taxes, Fed, state NY, medicare, SS)
16% (housing this part included property taxes)
As you can see, this gets me to 70-75% and we live on the rest. We spend about $3500-4000 on food, utilities, personal items and try to live within our means (joined costco, etc.) and spend another $1000/ month on auto (one vehicle is leased, other is an 11 year old car given to me by my father with 70K miles on it). There is also costs for tolls and gas.
I’m not sure what we are doing wrong. The biggest slice in the pie above obviously is taxes and I do have a CPA. But not sure what else I can do except contribute to 403B 457B, pay mortgage interest.
If you have any suggestions, I’d appreciate it. Thanks.
jsong23
That’s a lot of tax, be sure you’re not overpaying. Also consider leaving NY? You’re telling me you’re spending 16%*$450K=$72K a year on housing. Add in the NY specific taxes and I can see why it would be hard to get ahead.
The good news is that you’re saving enough, and perhaps even a little more than you need. But I’d be learning everything I could about reducing my taxes if I was paying over 30% of my gross in tax. On similar income I’m probably only going to pay 22-23% this year. It was 21% last year on lower income.
Hey WCI,
1. Regarding the housing, we purchased a home last year for 950K last year (this is a 2700 sq foot home, 3 beds, vinyl siding, small lot) and the loan amount was for 700K for 15y at 3.25%. The monthly mortgage payments are about $4900 plus property taxes comes out to about $5600/ month. If I add utilities, etc it comes close to $6000/month or 72K/year (16% of my total income). It’s just the cost of housing around the NYC metro area and currently I cannot move due to family reasons.
2. Regarding the taxes, I’ve run the numbers using paycheck calculator and taxcaster apps. I will be paying roughly Fed 110K, State: 25K, Medicare: 6K, SS: 7K for a total of about $148K which comes out to about 33% of my total salary.
Now this is based on a taxable income of $415K (450 – 35K for 403/457 contributions). I did not do personal deductions (not sure about the phase-outs) or the mortgage interest deductions yet and I’m sure those will decrease it a little. I also live in NJ but work in NY and pay state income taxes in NY so that complicates it a little. But I will contribute to a NY 529 to get the NYS income tax deduction.
I really don’t have anything else I can do as far as I can tell. I would love to do an HSA but it is not available. Thanks.
The bad news is that’s a terrible tax situation you probably can’t do much about. The good news is that even after paying those taxes and housing costs, you’ve still got $200K of income to spend/save. With a 20% savings rate, that’s still about $10K a month left over. That’s a pretty nice life.
Jason,
You don’t want to move for “family reasons” but your situation would make me reconsider. You are paying in monthly housing expenses what my family pays for an entire year. You bought a 3br home for $1M…that is just crazy. For a cardiologist, I think you are being underpaid. Congrats on saving 20% but if you are looking to get ahead, look to greener pastures.
This is it! I have always wondered where that 15-20% savings rate came from and how often you say “definitely not 5%” is going to cut it. Thanks so much for making this very sensible.
A couple of grammatical errors:
1st paragraph “… how much he needed to safe each year”
Last paragraph “… more after your retire”
Thanks, fixed.
I believe you have addressed this elsewhere but if we are paying down our student loans (refinanced and paying down at an accelerated rate) do you consider this as part of our “savings rate?”
Not really. That’s something you need to do in addition to saving for retirement. It can all be done at once (save 20% for retirement, save for college PLUS pay down debt rapidly) but only if you control your lifestyle by living somewhat similar to how you did as a resident until the debt is gone. Student loans aren’t like your mother-in-law, where you move her into the basement and keep her around for a few decades. Kick them out of your life as soon as you can and before you get used to all that money.
WCI,
Great posting on the background of a safe savings rate.
Could you help me with the math on the savings rate?
How do you determine your savings rate? I had been calculating mine by simply adding my cash savings, 403b contributions, HSA contributions, and Backdoor Roth savings and dividing them by my gross salary.
Then I read on MMM how he calculates his savings rate using his gross salary plus 401a contributions minus taxes and insurance.
Thank you for any guidance and for your service.
Also, do you include your principal mortgage payments into your savings rate?
No, I probably wouldn’t count those. You can if you want since the only person you’re comparing against is yourself, but since you have to pay for housing one way or another, I wouldn’t.
MMM has a 401(a)? That’s interesting.
But no, I use gross income, not net. You can use either. For instance, I saved 42% of gross last year, but 62% of net. Really the same dollar figure.
How do you account for purchasing a practice? Do you still use 15-20% of gross even with your practice payments? Thanks.
My rule of thumb is 20% of gross to retirement for attendings. Are there times where it might make sense to put your money elsewhere to meet shorter term goals? Sure. I’m thinking things like paying off student loans, saving up a home down payment, or buying a practice. But I find if people really live like a resident for 2-5 years after training, they can meet those goals AND still put 20% toward retirement.
Luckily for many, 20% of gross income is significant greater than the summation of the limits for various retirement accounts ($55,000 + $3,450 + $5,500 = $63,950). So for someone without children, or a spouse, any salary over $320,000 would be that you can’t meet the 20% goal through retirement accounts. If our 403b does not allow for after-tax contributions, this number may be even lower and no where near the 20% of gross income. Are you making up the difference with taxable investment accounts?
Not necessarily, you’re ignoring cash balance plans. But yes, if the sum of your retirement accounts is less than 20% of gross, the rest needs to go into a taxable investing account.
That’s an interesting table. Two thoughts: 1) Most people have variable income in their accumulation stage, so thinking about this as fixed percentage obscures a fair amount. 2) Most people will expect their post-retirement income to relate to their recent pre-retirement income, so if you retire at 65 your expectations are more tied to your lifestyle at 60 than at 25.
Anyway over my 15 years post college, I’ve seen my income veer from negative (graduate school) to high (recently). Unfortunately, savings from my high income years has much less time to compound than the meager savings I had before graduate school. I’d be curious to see an analysis of lifetime investments as a percentage of lifetime income, adjusted for time. So if fictional me saved 20% of my gross lifetime earnings in the first 5 years of my working life, I would have way more money at retirement than if I saved 40% of my gross lifetime earnings in the last 5 years of my working life.
I figure I am going to have to save more than 33% of my gross lifetime earnings to have the results Pfau forecasts because I am playing catch up.
These models are fun to think about, but I am where I am and can only control my savings rate for today.