By Dr. Jim Dahle, WCI Founder
Numerous “alternative” investments are available for investors to add to their portfolios. Their popularity tends to directly follow a recent run-up in prices. While my portfolio consists of relatively boring stocks, bonds, and real estate, lots of people like to add a little spice to their portfolios using asset classes such as cryptocurrency, art, precious metals, viaticals, timber, reinsurance, commodities, or venture capital. Some invest in oil and gas. None of these investments are mandatory for a portfolio, and you certainly don't have to invest in everything to be successful.
Oil and gas investments are popular among the “tax break” crowd, especially when the price of a barrel of oil balloons. Like real estate investing, the industry benefits from government encouragement in the form of “unfair” tax breaks that politicians are often trying to end, particularly politicians who favor renewable energy. Also like real estate, there is a wide range of ways to invest in oil and gas.
How to Invest in Oil and Gas
There are numerous ways to invest in oil and gas. Let's go through each of them.
Futures
Future contracts are a useful way to hedge your business against an increase in the cost of oil and its products. These derivatives are most famously used by Southwest Airlines. However, they are also a convenient way to bet on price movements of commodities. Oil futures contracts trade on the New York Mercantile Exchange in quantities of 1,000 barrels of oil. Like any derivative, these can be extremely volatile, and you can lose more than you invested. They are also not tax-efficient at all.
Publicly Traded Stocks
There are plenty of publicly traded companies out there that produce, refine, and distribute oil and gas. Exxon, Chevron, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips, and Schlumberger are well-known examples. Like any stock, a buy-and-hold approach can be very tax-efficient, although as value stocks, the dividend yields tend to be high. The bigger problem with individual stock investing is that you are taking on uncompensated risk. In investing theory, you should not be compensated for taking on risk that can be diversified away.
Mutual Funds and ETFs
You can avoid uncompensated risk by buying all of the oil and gas stocks via an index mutual fund or ETF. While there is an additional cost to doing this, it is likely worth paying. Even Vanguard has an energy ETF (VDE) with an expense ratio of 0.1%, a dividend yield in September 2023 of about 3%, 112 different stocks, and a 10-year performance of 3.77% per year. (Now you know why hardly anybody has been talking about oil and gas investments for a while.)
There are also ETFs out there that just invest in futures contracts, so it is important that you look under the hood and know exactly what you are buying. Perhaps the most famous is USO, which will manage a portfolio of oil futures contracts for you for 0.6% per year. USO is a very different investment from VDE. It's much more of a bet on short-term oil prices and probably not a great long-term holding. Fifteen-year returns are -14.71% per year. That means if you had bought it 15 years ago and held it until now, you would have lost more than 90% of your investment.
Mineral Rights (Royalties)
Another method of investing in oil and gas is to own the rights to exploit minerals and to license those rights to others. Despite not being in a solid state, oil and gas are considered minerals. You can invest in mineral rights by simply purchasing land that contains oil and gas. However, be aware that surface rights and mineral rights are not always connected. It's possible to own the mineral rights without owning the right to use the surface and vice versa. Royalties tend to be relatively low risk and provide quite passive income. That income can be highly variable, however.
Royalties are reported on Schedule E of your tax return, the same form used for many real estate investments. Royalties are taxed as ordinary income, although they are not subject to payroll taxes like Social Security and Medicare unless you are actively involved in the profession producing the royalties. For example, if you're a full-time author getting book royalties, payroll taxes are due. If you're an oil driller getting oil royalties, payroll taxes are due. If you're a doctor who owns a piece of land that receives oil royalties, no payroll taxes are due. A typical royalty may be 12%-25% of the “net revenue interest” of the project. Multiple mineral rights/royalties can be packaged into a private fund or other entity to provide convenience, diversification, and liquidity.
Working Interests
If the mineral rights owner gets 12%-25%, the entity with the “working interest” is getting the rest. This is the highest risk and potentially highest reward way to invest. The working interest entity is actually in the business of getting the oil or gas out of the ground and selling it. A working interest is simply the agreement that allows the entity to exploit the mineral resources, i.e. pump out the oil and sell it. This can still be passive income as long as the investor is not actively involved in running the business. This income is generally reported on Schedule C and is subject to ordinary income tax rates. However, these entities are often set up as partnerships, also reported on Schedule E. If you know someone who “owns an oil well,” this is likely what they have.
Master Limited Partnerships
A master limited partnership (MLP) combines the benefits of a publicly traded company (liquidity and daily pricing) with the benefits of a partnership (pass through of losses). Due to the unique taxation of oil and gas investments, this is a common form of investment. Like a REIT, an MLP has to distribute 90% of its income, and a good chunk of its distributions are considered a non-taxable return of capital for tax purposes. There are currently 42 of these MLPs that are taxed as partnerships (there are some others that have chosen to be taxed as corporations), and almost all of them are in energy. Yes, there is an ETF that invests in all of them that costs 0.45% per year. MLPs are often involved more in the transport of oil and gas (think pipelines) than the actual production of oil and gas.
Private General and Limited Partnerships
Just like in real estate, you can invest in private partnerships as well. Typically you must qualify as an accredited investor (income of $200,000+ for each of the last two years or $1 million+ in investable assets). Most of the time you are a limited partner in these partnerships (no control but your loss is limited to your investment). However, there are some unique partnerships set up such that you could participate on the general partner side as well.
More information here:
Securities Lending — Extra Income or a Mirage?
Tax Benefits of Oil and Gas Investing
First, any business expense is deductible. That's not some huge tax break or anything; that's just the way business works. But when you ask anybody about the tax benefits of some investment, they'll cite all kinds of things that are basically just business expenses. “If you get a rental property, you can write off the cost of repairing it!” Uh . . . OK, that's great, but not something that is going to entice me to invest due to “huge tax breaks.” But now, we're going to focus on the two “huge tax breaks” of oil and gas investing. But before we do so, we need to do a little bit of terminology first.
Intangible and Tangible Expenses of Drilling
When you go to drill an oil well, there are two types of expenses: tangible and intangible. Tangible expenses are primarily drilling equipment, and they must be depreciated over seven years. These are typically about 25% of the cost of drilling a well. Intangible expenses are immediately deductible and include items such as labor, grease, chemicals, “mud,” etc., and they make up about 75% of the cost of drilling a well.
Active vs. Passive
A royalty interest is considered passive income, but a working (or operating) interest is considered active income. Active losses can be used against other forms of active income, such as clinical income. The equivalent in real estate is Real Estate Professional Status (REPS), where you can use your depreciation losses against your (or more likely your spouse's) clinical income. You're basically a general partner running a business with unlimited liability.
If you go to drill a new well, you get most of your expenses (and tax deductions) upfront. That can be helpful in offsetting other income.
But all that is really just deducting business expenses. Yes, you can take more of these expenses as deductions upfront than you can with other businesses, but in many situations, that isn't worth all that much.
Exception to Passive Loss Limitation
What is unique here with oil and gas investing compared to real estate is that you don't have to actually be actively involved in running the business to use these passive losses against your active income. There is no REPS status for oil and gas. Everybody gets “oil and gas REPS status” without having to do any work.
Small Producer Depletion Allowance
A second unique tax break is that if a company is producing less than 50,000 barrels of oil a day, it qualifies as a small producer. That means you can deduct 15% of the gross income from oil and gas drilling activities as a “depletion allowance.” This cannot be more than the net income from the venture. But 15% of gross income can be a huge chunk of net income, and it is basically tax-free. That's a big tax break.
More information here:
A Neurologist’s Road to Becoming a Bitcoin Maximalist: Why Bitcoin Is Not the Next AOL
An Example of Oil and Gas Investment Tax Breaks
Let's say a highly compensated ($800,000) California physician is planning to work for a few more years. They are interested in investing in oil and gas with part of their portfolio. They make a $250,000 investment into an oil and gas limited partnership. They never visit the site or do anything else with the company. The doc goes back to their practice and sees patients and operates on them.
The partnership uses the doctor's money to drill a well. It doesn't actually produce any oil that year. All expenses and no income. The doctor gets a K-1 at the end of the year showing a loss of $180,000. They subtract that from their income and save about $90,000 in taxes that first year. Eventually, the well starts pumping oil and their investment starts paying off and sends them passive income for another decade. However, by that point, the doctor is retired and in a much lower tax bracket.
Is Oil a High-Risk Investment?
That example doesn't mean it was a “no-brainer investment.” It's entirely possible that the well never found enough oil for the doctor to get back their $160,000, much less $250,000. It's a risky investment. But it does come with a pretty good tax subsidy. Even if the well never found oil, their $250,000 at least bought them a $90,000 tax break. But you shouldn't let the tax tail wag the investment dog.
More information here:
Investing in Collectibles: Is Investing in Jewelry, Coins, and Ferraris Worth It?
How Shorting Ethereum Helped Us Make Payroll
Are Oil and Gas a Good Investment?
Oil and gas can be a good investment for those who know what they're doing. It does have some unique tax breaks associated with it. However, like any alternative investment, it isn't mandatory for your portfolio. For me, I don't have any plans to invest in oil and gas other than continuing to own shares of total stock market index funds.
What do you think? Have you invested in oil and gas? In what form? How did the investment turn out? Comment below!
In the section on Publicly Traded Stocks, where you say, “In investing theory, you should not be compensated for taking on risk that can be diversified away,” are you sure you didn’t intend to say, “In investing theory, you should not take uncompensated risk that can be diversified away” ?
I’m not sure I see the difference between your two statements. They mean the same thing to me when I hear them.
Really?!
What about the following two statements, which have a parallel logical structure:
1. We should not be compensated for reading this blog.
2. We should not read blogs for which we are uncompensated.
I see what you’re saying. I’ll try to be more careful with my phrasing.
I have been fooled by Oil and Gas investments twice in my investing career. Both seemed to be valid investments at the time. One ended in the CEO of a publicly traded company in jail and the SEC lawsuit against him distributing the tiny amount of remaining funds. This was a 60% loss for me after it was all said and done.
The second one ended in a 90% loss and the fraudster ending up in jail.
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.
My take…The people in Oil and Gas investments are as a blanket statement some of the most dishonest people on the earth. Despite the tax benefits, I will never invest in any oil and gas venture again.
Everyone I have spoken to that invested in oil and gas for the tax break regrets it. The industry is filled with scams and they usually invest a certain amount and get about 5% of it back before a dry well is hit and then they lose everything. So yes they got their 30% tax break or whatever, but then lost the rest of their 70% investment. Stuff like this in theory is good, but in reality is so hard to find someone reliable to invest with or the right way to do it. Sounds similar to whole life insurance where it may benefit some people if it is perfectly structured, but since most people don’t know how to structure it or what any of it means it is better off to not do it. Reminds me of a deadlift or “good morning” exercise where there are good benefits of doing it, but the problem is most people that try to do these exercises are not doing them correctly and cause more harm to their lower back than good so better off sticking to simple stuff.
I’m not certain (please correct me if it appears that I am mistaken), but I believe that passive losses would be generated from the hypothetical O&G investment in the “An Example of Oil and Gas Investment Tax Breaks Section”. I think passive losses can typically only be used to offset Passive Income, not Ordinary Income (which is what the physician earns from his practice in said example). If true, then the $180k loss would not be able to be netted against the $800k ordinary income in year 1; rather, the $180k loss would lower the passive income from this particular investment in subsequent years (if/when it began to earn money) or it could be used to offset passive income from other passive investments besides this one (if they exist).
Note there is an exception to this (passive loss/passive income offsetting) rule in the year the passive investment is fully disposed of. In that year, all cumulative unused passive losses from the investment can be used to offset income from any other source/category.
That sounds right for real estate, but I understand O&G works differently as I noted two paragraphs higher:
If you’re sure that’s not right, I’d appreciate chapter and verse so I can correct it.
Would have helped if I read the entire article in detail, sorry about that!
I’m not familiar with this area, but the article piqued my interest. As you state in the article, in order to be able to use these “passive” losses to offset non-passive (ordinary) income, the O&G investment needs to be considered a “working interest” investment. Additionally, and importantly, the investment in this working interest cannot limit the investor’s liability with respect to the interest. This essentially means that the investor needs to hold a GP (general partner) interest or equivalent, not a limited partner interest. It seems that if the investor’s liability is limited, then you cannot use the passive losses to offset ordinary income.
Retrieved most of the info from the below sources.
https://weaver.com/blog/individual-tax-considerations-investing-oil-and-gas-properties
and
https://answerconnect.cch.com/document/arp1002bc3cdc7c561000b51ed8d385ad16940cb/federal/irc/explanation/passive-activity-rules-working-interests-in-oil-and-gas-property#:~:text=A%20working%20interest%20in%20an,a%20general%20partner%20interest%20in
You may be right, it’s definitely confusing.
Can you use depreciation passive losses from real estate equity investments to offset 1099 passive income from mineral rights equity ownership?
I’m not certain, but I believe so. As long as both the losses and the income are passive (i.e. you don’t materially participate in the real estate and the mineral rights interest is a limited partner interest), they should be able to be offset against each other.
Thanks, that’s what I’m thinking too
Now we’re talkin’ Dr. Jim!
Now if you could just see the light on BTC … (-: