By Dr. Jim Dahle, WCI Founder

WCI readers continue to ask about buying child life insurance and if it's worth it. I would hope that most long-term regular readers already know the answer to this question. But I'm seeing it enough that it is clearly worth addressing.


Should I Buy Life Insurance for My Child?

Not no, but heck no. Child life insurance, like most permanent insurance, is a product made to be sold, not bought. Let's consider the reasons why. And then we'll try to find some articles advocating for buying life insurance on your child and debunk them.


Why Child Life Insurance Is Not Worth It


#1 Your Child Has No Income

The main purpose of life insurance is to replace the necessary earned income of a breadwinner. If you are financially independent, you don't need life insurance. If you depend on someone else for your income/lifestyle, then you don't need life insurance. Now, a reasonable case can be made to carry some amount of life insurance if you contribute in an economic way to a household, even if that way isn't a paycheck (think stay-at-home mom whose household duties might cost $30,000-$100,000 per year to replace), but that doesn't apply to a child. I have no doubt in my mind that if, heaven forbid, one of my children died, that my household expenses would go DOWN, not up.


#2 A Typical Burial Isn't That Expensive

Others advocate that you should buy life insurance for your child to pay for their burial expenses. “It's only pennies a day,” they say. Well, the reasons it's only pennies a day are that it's extremely unlikely that your child will die and because a burial cost isn't that expensive, either. A typical burial is < $10,000. If you can't cover $10,000 out of either your current earnings or your emergency fund, you have a lot bigger financial problems than whether to insure your children. But sure, if that would be a financial catastrophe for you, then buy your kid a $10,000 life insurance policy.


#3 It Doesn't Preserve Insurability (Maybe)

Some people buy life insurance on their kids thinking it will be great for them in case they develop diabetes at age 8 or something and can't buy life insurance as an adult. However, their life insurance need as an adult is likely to be $500K-$5M, and that doesn't even include the effects of inflation over the next 20-50 years (which at 3% turns that $500K-$5M into $900K-$9M at 20 years and $2.2M-$22M at 50 years). Do you really think that $10,000 whole life policy is going to make any kind of significant dent into that kind of need? Not a chance. This isn't a disability insurance policy that is sold with a “Future Purchase Option” rider. There's no guarantee they can actually buy more life insurance at a reasonable price later. And nobody is going to buy a $2M whole life policy on their child. Give me a break. If you're buying life insurance from the same company that sells you baby food, there's an issue.

In the comments section of this post, there's a discussion about how insurance companies provide “Guaranteed Insurability Riders” for juvenile policies. For instance, if someone purchases a $100,000 life insurance policy for their child, they can opt for this rider, granting multiple opportunities to increase coverage once the child reaches a certain age (typically over 25). Some carriers even offer 8-9 different chances, each matching the original face amount of the life insurance. This feature could potentially allow for a more substantial benefit, safeguarding the child's insurability in case of a health event that might complicate obtaining life insurance as an adult. However, it's important to note that this option limits the child to purchasing whole life insurance, excluding term life. Nevertheless, for parents or grandparents seeking a rationale to invest in life insurance for a child, this could be a viable consideration.


life insurance for children

Only one person in this picture carries life insurance. Guess who?

#4 Life Insurance Is a Terrible Investment

In case you've never read through my series on The Myths of Whole Life Insurance (most of what is sold for children) it is important that I point out that the returns on a whole life insurance policy are terrible. Often negative for a decade or two, they are only guaranteed to be about 2% over a lifetime and projected to be perhaps 3%-5%. The smaller the policy (like most child policies) the lower the return due to more of it being eaten up by administrative and insurance costs.


#5 Nobody Knows What to Do with an Inherited Life Insurance Policy

I'm always seeing posts from people who were given a life insurance policy at 25 or 40 that their parents had been paying on for decades. The analysis of what to do with it is always complicated. In many ways, they're inheriting your poor decision. Don't do that to your kids.


#6 If They Don't Die, They Can Use the Cash Value in Their 20s

The worst part about giving the kids your bad decision (to buy whole life insurance on them) is that if you had only given them something with a higher return, they'd be getting a lot more money and with a lot fewer strings attached. The likely return on whole life after 20-30 years is probably 0-2%. If you had just given them shares of a good stock index fund, that return could be more like 7%-10%. That makes a big difference over decades, not to mention the better tax treatment on gains when they cash it out. It would be even better if you gave them the money in one of the three ways I'm giving my kids money:


#1 A Roth IRA

The daddy match allows all their earned income to go into a Roth IRA, never to be taxed again, while they spend the equivalent amount of my money.


#2 A 529

If used for college, a 529 account is a way better plan than anything else. Not only is there an upfront state tax break in many states, but all earnings are tax-free.



For those non-college expenses, it's better to have the money in their name, so it is only taxed at their lower tax bracket. In fact, unless it becomes a really big account or is invested very tax-inefficiently, chances are it won't be taxed at all.

OK, enough ranting about conniving insurance salesmen duping the financially illiterate into purchasing a product made to be sold at one of the more emotional times of life (and sometimes even while they're still in the hospital after delivery).


What Do Others Think of Child Life Insurance?

Donna Fuscaldo at Fox Business does a typical journalist article where she doesn't give her opinion. She just found someone with opinions on both sides of this “argument” and presented their views. She talked to someone who sells life insurance:

With a term policy, Bill White, vice president, life insurance and annuity product line leader at insurer USAA, says the insurance is added as a rider and once the child grows up, it can be converted to the child’s own $100,000 policy. He adds that type of coverage would ensure if the unthinkable happened, the funeral costs would be covered.

And someone with some sense:

“You buy insurance strictly for risk protection,” says Tony Steuer, creator of Insurance Literacy “Because it’s mixing in two different types of financial products, it’s not taking the best of either one.” “Buying life insurance as an investment made sense back in the 1940s when there were limited options, but today there are countless ways to grow money with relatively low risk taking,” says Steur, pointing to an exchange-traded fund with low fees.

The article does point out the only valid reason for life insurance on a child that I could find—if your child supports you financially.

One instance where buying a life insurance policy on a child makes sense is situations where the parents are dependent on their child for their livelihood (think Miley Cyrus or other child stars).

I would point out that if you are reading this blog, it is highly unlikely you're in that situation. Even if your child is a star, you're probably not financially dependent on them.

Here's one from the Insurance Information Institute (sounds unbiased, right?) It talked about the usual wrong reasons to buy insurance, then throws out this beauty:

Still another reason for buying life insurance on a child’s life is part of a program to teach the child financial responsibility. Typically the insurance is whole life insurance, ownership of which is transferred to the child when he or she turns 21.

Sounds like a good way to teach your child to be financially illiterate to me, or at least demonstrate to them your financial illiteracy as soon as they realize what you've done.

U.S. News got it right, when it wrote an article titled 4 Types of Life Insurance You Should Never Buy:

2. Life insurance for children. In general, life insurance for kids is a huge waste of money. That’s because (thankfully) most children are born healthy and live a very long time. And since children don’t have any income, you don’t really have any reason to insure their lives, as cold as that may seem. Just because you don’t buy insurance doesn’t mean you don’t love your children. It means you are smart enough to put that money to better use—like saving for a college education.

I love the line about how it doesn't mean you don't love your kids if you don't insure them. Take that, Gerber!

Do your kids a favor—ensure financial independence for yourself, then put something away in a higher-returning investment inside a tax-protected account that they can use in their 20s when they can really benefit from your help.

What do you think? Did you purchase life insurance on your child? Why or why not? Do you regret it? Did your parents buy life insurance on you? Was it helpful? Comment below!

[This updated article was originally published in 2017.]