That said, from time to time I enjoy writing about some of the “other roads to Dublin.” Fancy investments are interesting and sometimes have different risks and rewards when compared with a basic index fund portfolio. Entrepreneurship has changed my life and that of many other physicians. Early financial independence opens all kinds of other doorways in your life. So in a blog about all things financial for high earners, from time to time I write about these other subjects. Today is one of those days.
Today we're going to talk about passive income and why it beats the pants off of active income in almost every respect. So without further ado-
Six Ways Passive Income Beats Active
1. No Payroll Taxes
Payroll taxes are primarily Social Security and Medicare taxes. All earned income is subject to Medicare tax. That's 2.9% (including the employer portion), plus the extra PPACA tax of 0.9% for a high earner. That's 3.8%. What do you get for that 3.8% (which may be $20K a year or more for a high earner)? Exactly the same benefits as the guy who paid $1000 in Medicare taxes that year. And the guy who only paid Medicare taxes for 10 years and retired at 28. Doesn't seem too fair, does it, but that's the way it works. Social Security tax is a little better in that it goes away after $127,200 per year of earned income, but it is also a much higher tax- 12.4% including the employer portion. Social Security also gives you a little more of a benefit when you pay more into it, but the return on that “investment” is pretty poor beyond the second bend point.
What's the point? Well, you don't pay these taxes on passive income. At all. Cool trick eh?
Now, purists will point out that under PPACA passive income can also be subject to that 3.8% Medicare tax. That's true, but only for high earners and as I write this in mid-summer, seems likely to go away anyway. [Update just prior to publication: Doesn't look like PPACA is going away after all! The next section may soon be out of date too.]
The benefit to cost ratio of payroll taxes is even lower for a dual income couple, so passive income is an even better deal for them.
2. Lower Tax Scale
The ordinary income tax brackets are dramatically different from the qualified dividends/capital gains tax scale. Take a look:
Which rate do you want to pay at? 15% or 0%? 35% or 15%? 40% or 20%? Seems like a pretty easy decision to me.
Real estate investors don't get to enjoy that lower qualified dividends rate on their passive income, but they get something almost as good- depreciation. Now I'm of the school of thought that you get to take depreciation mostly because buildings and appliances really do depreciate, but even so, it gets pretty favorable tax treatment, particularly for a high earner. Depreciating your property allows you to defer taxes on them until you sell the property and the depreciation is recaptured. That deferral by itself is very useful, particularly if it allows you to defer it until such a time as you are in a lower bracket. You can also avoid that recapture completely by doing 1031 exchanges from one property to another until the owner dies and gets that step-up in basis at death. But wait, there's more. That recapture tax rate maxes out at 25%, even if you're in the 39.6% tax bracket.
4. Works When You Aren't
Let's move away from the tax advantages of passive income over earned income now, although I think you've gotten the message- people with high earned income are the suckers in our progressive, capitalistic tax system.
Interest never sleeps nor sickens nor dies; it never goes to the hospital; it works on Sundays and holidays; it never takes a vacation; it never visits nor travels; it takes no pleasure; it is never laid off work nor discharged from employment; it never works on reduced hours; it never has short crops nor droughts; it never pays taxes; it buys no food; it wears no clothes; it is unhoused and without home and so has no repairs, no replacements, no shingling, plumbing, painting, or whitewashing; it has neither wife, children, father, mother, nor kinfolk to watch over and care for; it has no expense of living; it has neither weddings nor births nor deaths; it has no love, no sympathy; it is as hard and soulless as a granite cliff. Once in debt, interest is your companion every minute of the day and night; you cannot shun it or slip away from it; you cannot dismiss it; it yields neither to entreaties, demands, or orders; and whenever you get in its way or cross its course or fail to meet its demands, it crushes you.
I want interest (and other sources of passive income) working FOR me, not AGAINST me.
While reading a very interesting book recently about the conquest of the Northwestern Territory (it's Ohio, not Oregon for those of you who aren't history buffs) I realized that the founding fathers of the US were all unabashed capitalists. Washington, Hamilton etc all held title to huge tracts of land West of the Appalachians that they had been speculating in for decades. Forming the US Army (a standing army was a big deal to a people who at the time equated a standing army with tyranny) and conquering the Iroquois was, in at least some respects, about profiting on their investments. While WCI readers probably don't have any plans to conquer other nations, the real point of all this financial stuff we talk about on this blog is to turn yourself into a capitalist as quickly as possible. While capitalism has its issues, it's still the best economic system we've found yet.
Capitalism basically means passive income. It means making your money work as hard as you do, or better yet, did.
Another great aspect of passive income is that it is often completely scalable. Consider my book. If I sell 10 copies of it, I might get $100. If I sell 100 copies of it, I might get $1000. How much additional work did it take for me to sell those extra 90 books? Zero. And there's nothing keeping me from selling 1,000 or even 10,000 copies of the book. A website is the same way. No limit on the eyeballs that can view it (as long as I keep upgrading the hosting plan!) Shares of stock are the same way. Owning 100,000 shares is no more work than owning 10 shares. If you're a real estate investor, once you get your “system” in place (agent, insurance guy, attorney, accountant, property manager, repairman etc) it may not take you much more work at all to own ten properties than to own one. Maybe you do speaking gigs and charge $50 a head. Is it any more work to speak to 500 instead of 50? Not really. Leveraging your money is great, but leveraging your time through scalability is even better.
The Only Bad Thing About Passive Income
In fact, as I laid in bed one morning coming up with this post, I could really only think of one aspect of passive income that is worse than earned income. If you are a high earner, you can't deduct real estate losses against your earned income unless you qualify as a “real estate professional,” which basically means you spend > 750 hours a year doing it. That's it. The rest of the time, passive beats active.
What do you think? What sources of passive income do you have? Which ones are you trying to develop? Do you think it's fair that capital gets better tax treatment than labor? Why or why not? Comment below!