[Editor’s Note: We’ve posted a job here at The White Coat Investor, a new position as a Chief Operating Officer. If you know someone who would be a good fit for this position, please encourage them to apply.]
Priya writes in and suggests:
I wondered if you might discuss Callan charts in a blog post or podcast. They are interesting and give a visual illustration of how different parts of the economy cycle into good times and bad times.
If you know what Priya is referring to, this blog post is likely not going to be very helpful to you. If you have no idea, today I am going to introduce you to an important investing concept.
In 1999, Jay Kloepfer of Callan put together and published a table, very loosely modeled after the Periodic Table of the Elements those of us who suffered through high school and college chemistry classes know so well. Kloepfer’s table demonstrated the comparative returns of the various investment asset classes. The idea was to make a visual representation of how the best asset class to invest in changed year to year. I was unable to find the very first Callan Periodic Table of Investment Returns (send me a link if you have one), but I did find the chart from 2007.
The latest one is also easy to find on Google.
There now lots of variations and different forms for these tables, but they all illustrate the same principles, and those principles are really important for you to understand. You all know I love lists, so let’s make a list!
# 1 The Same Asset Class Does Not Win Every Year
The first lesson to learn is that there are no permanent winners. Even if one asset class has higher long-term historical returns than another, that doesn’t mean it will do well every single year. Let’s take a look at US Large Cap Stocks. In the older version, this is a blue box labeled “S&P 500”, a US large-cap stock index. In the newer chart, this is a dark blue box labeled “large-cap equity”. Over the last 20 years, large-cap stocks were in the top three best performers 6 times and the best of the best once. They were in the bottom three performers 6 times and the worst of the worst once. Emerging Markets Stocks were the best on 5 occasions and the worst on 4 occasions. That means if you want to own the best performing asset class in a given year, you have two strategies available to you:
- Own every asset class or
- Use your crystal ball to predict the future
# 2 Return to the Mean Is Real
Jack Bogle always liked to point out that an asset class tends to return to the mean. If something had done well lately, watch out, it was likely due for some rough times and vice versa. The less you pay for a security, the better its future returns. The more you pay, the worse its future returns are likely to be. As you can see from the table, there are many times when a given asset class goes from best to worst and vice versa in a single year. Look at international stocks from 1999 to 2000 or emerging market stocks from 2007 to 2008 or bonds from 2002 to 2003 or cash from 2017 to 2018. Best to worst. Or going the other way, check out international stocks from 1994 to 1995, small value stocks from 1999 to 2000, real estate from 2006 to 2007, or emerging market stocks from 2008 to 2009. Sometimes things turn on a dime.
# 3 There is Some Momentum
Momentum is the idea that what is doing well will continue to do well, at least for a while. You can see that any given asset class doesn’t win every year, it doesn’t exactly alternate from best to worst to best again in any given period. Sometimes it has a run of good years. Like large-cap stocks in the late 1990s. Like bonds in 2000-2002. Or real estate and emerging markets in 2003-2006. Or sometimes there is a run of bad years, like bonds in 2003-2006 or international bonds in 2012-2016.
Don’t assume that just because something did poorly recently that it will do well anytime soon. Much to the chagrin of those with large international stock allocations in their portfolios (which beat US stocks every year from 2002-2007 when I was coming of age as an investor), International stocks have only outperformed US stocks in 2 of the last 9 years. As they say in the sports world, sometimes a team gets streaky.
# 4 It is Very Difficult to Predict In Advance Which Will Do Best
So when will you see return to the mean and when will you see momentum? In the words of Yoda, “Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future.” The lesson to learn there is that you need an investing plan likely to be successful that doesn’t require you to be able to predict the future. That means a fixed asset allocation. If emerging market stocks do well this year? Great, sell some and buy something else to rebalance or direct new money elsewhere. If they do poorly, buy more until your portfolio is back in balance.
# 5 Some Asset Classes are More Volatile Than Others
# 6 Some Years Are Better Than Others
You will also notice that some years everything seemed to do well, and some years almost nothing seemed to do well. Look at 1988. The worst asset class, bonds, returned 8%. In 2008 the highlight was bonds…returning 5%. In 2014, the highlight was large-cap stocks, returning 1% and just last year, cash cleaned house with a return of less than 2%. In almost half of the years, none of the asset classes had a negative return.
# 7 Diversify
The more you stare at the tables, the more lessons you may learn about a given asset class and its relationship to others. But the main lesson you should take away from a careful examination of these tables is the need for inter-asset class diversification. Putting all your money in stocks, especially one type of stocks, or bonds or real estate is a poor way to build a portfolio and, with just a little bit of bad luck, you could end up not reaching your financial goals.
What do you think? What lessons have you learned from examining these tables each year? How have they influenced your portfolio construction? Comment below!