Does disability insurance cover everything? Unfortunately not, and you may have heard of disability insurance exclusions and limitations. Let's break down the variables that contribute to a disability policy being issued at less than 100% of its potential: the insurance company, the agent, and the client/insured.
Why Do Disability Insurance Companies Add Exclusions and Limitations?
Insurance companies protect against risk, this is the nature of their business model. Insurance companies offer policyholders a means to protect themselves against a risk of loss they cannot otherwise pay for on their own (self-insure). However, insurance companies also have to protect themselves, as businesses, against risk as well – this is why they have underwriting. Each insurance company has slightly different criteria within their underwriting model; underwriting is the way the insurance company determines if the risk a potential policyholder presents is “worth” the policy premium it would receive. In the case of disability insurance; the insurance company evaluates the risk an applicant presents and may approve a policy, but, that policy has exclusions, limitations, or restrictions. The insurance company does this so it can still insure someone, but protect itself from what it sees as certain “high risk” conditions pertaining to that applicant.
What are Exclusions in Insurance?
An exclusion is where the insurance company says that they will insure a client, but will add language to say that they will not cover certain body parts, conditions, or activities. Some black and white examples would be:
- Multiple knee surgeries to repair damage from skiing or playing sports. Disability carriers are likely to exclude that knee, at a minimum.
- A pre-existing health issue like anxiety treated with medication. Carriers are likely to exclude “mental/nervous” conditions.
- Free-climbing (rock climbing). The insurance company is not going to cover a disability stemming from an activity they consider to be a hazardous.
Are Disability Insurance Exclusions Permanent?
Exclusions can be written into the final contract as permanent, or “reviewable” after a certain period of time. Using our examples above; the medically repaired knee might be a permanent exclusion (although it cannot hurt to have it reviewed). The anxiety may come with language from the insurance company saying the equivalent of, “In two years, if the client can demonstrate [backed up thoroughly by medical records] that the anxiety is resolved, and the medication has not been taken [per the advice of the prescribing physician], a review of this exclusion will be possible.” This is not a promise on the part of the insurance company, but there is the possibility of a review.

Dr Feinauer, leading the first pitch of the ever-classic Fin Arete, 5.10bR, Little Cottonwood Canyon, UT. He led this scary pitch because his disability insurance doesn't exclude climbing. 🙂
[Editor's Note: Don't count on ever getting a dangerous activity exclusion removed, it simply isn't logical. For example, consider my climbing exclusion. If I stop climbing, I don't need the exclusion removed. If I'm still climbing, why would they remove it? The only incentive for the insurance company to remove an exclusion is if you are taking your business elsewhere because someone else is offering you a policy without an exclusion.]
What are Disability Insurance Limitations?
A limitation may not be as pointed as an exclusion, but still limits the disability policy in some fashion. An example of a limitation would be:
An applicant has some health issue(s) and the insurance company issues a disability policy, without exclusion, but limits the policyholder’s benefit period to 10 years – instead of the “to age 67” they applied for originally. The insurance company is limiting their risk by limiting the duration they would potentially pay out benefits.
Pre Existing Condition Limitation
Any medical conditions you have at the time the policy is issued will likely be excluded, meaning if you have heart disease at the time of issuance, and it leads to you being disabled 5 years later, the policy isn't going to pay. Again, apply when you are young and healthy and/or when you haven't had medical problems for several years to minimize this.
Mental/Nervous Limitation
Many companies limit benefits to two years, where they might pay for “physical” disorders until you're 65 years old).
Other Disability Insurance Policy Exclusions
- War or act of war (with our current War on Terror, this could probably be interpreted pretty broadly)
- Active Military Duty (having served, this is pretty stupid since 95%+ of our military folks are never in any kind of serious danger of being hurt by a combatant)
- Normal Pregnancy (don't want to work because you're 8 months pregnant? Don't bother trying to get disability benefits for that)
- Foreign Travel (varies by policy, but many don't cover you during that European vacation, must less that humanitarian trip to Sudan-read the fine print)
How to Work with a Disability Insurance Agent to Understand Limitations and Exclusions
The Agent
So, how does the agent factor in? The agent has a dual responsibility – they need to serve you as their applicant/client, and they also need to operate with integrity when dealing with the insurance companies. Your agent needs to do a lot of things to keep your insurance application process (or policy service) moving along smoothly. For the purposes of this article, we are going to limit our discussion to exclusions, limitations, and restrictions within a disability insurance policy.
What your agent should be doing:
- Help to clarify or expand your answers pertaining to medical history and questions.
- Work with the underwriter of an insurance company and fight (advocate) for the very best, and most robust offer that insurance company will write.
- Ensure that you are applying with the insurance company that is best for you; remembering that each company has their own matrix for underwriting, policy features & benefits, as well as their own pricing models. The agent should be going into the process with all options “on the table”. They should be willing to move to another carrier if underwriting is indicating a negative approval. This is not to say that the original carrier should be “off the table”, but rather, to say that they need to be fighting for the best possible coverage for you.
What your agent should not do:
- Hide things for you – no credible agent ever would, and there are ramifications to you as the policyholder, as well as to them and their career if they do.
- Only offer you one option, unless the marketplace (literally) only has one option for you. This is exceptionally rare. You, as a potential policyholder may not like all of the options, but you almost always have more than one option.
- Offer the insurance company that is best for them as agents.
The last “should not” bullet is where we need to spend some additional time. To understand whether or not you are getting an objective analysis of your disability insurance options, you need to understand –in brief – how an insurance agent gets paid. If you work with an agent and you put a policy in place, the insurance company pays that agent a percentage of your overall premium, generally called first year commission. If you continue your policy year after year the insurance company may pay that same agent a smaller percentage each year, for x number of years (each company is a little different), this is called a renewal. Getting paid is not inherently the problem; doctors, plumbers, architects, and insurance agents get up every morning and go to work to earn money to live their lives.
Where it becomes difficult for a consumer is in understanding if your agent is working for you as a client, or “for” an insurance company. Insurance agents, generally, fall into one of three categories – regardless of the title they have on their business card:
“Independent”
This is an insurance agent who represents a variety of companies and in all likelihood, places insurance business with multiple different carriers throughout the year and over the course of their career. This agent is appointed by these carriers to represent their insurance product portfolio, but they have very limited contractual obligations (read: production requirements) to those carriers. For you as the client, this can afford you an objective look at the entire marketplace without wondering if your agent is guided by a sales goal.
Full disclosure: some insurance companies pay more than others but agents should not be compromising their objectivity over +/- 5%.
Company “X” Representative/Advisor
This is an agent with a “home team” company and they have formally aligned with company “X” by virtue of a contract. Within this agent’s contract with company “X”, is some form of production requirement to place that company’s insurance product portfolio. This agent likely has the ability to represent additional companies to their clients, but it may be to their advantage to get as many clients as possible to buy the “home team products”.
Full disclosure: you are not necessarily disserved by a company representative. I know many phenomenal agents who look out for their clients, always deliver solutions and products that are the very best fit for the client needs/wants, and objectively represent multiple companies while maintaining their contract with the “home team”. For you as a client, you just need to mindful that you are receiving the best offer for you, not for your agent.
“Captive” or “Proprietary”
This is an agent, who by some contract of employment, only represents one company and the insurance products that company offers. They may not be allowed to represent any other companies at all, or may have a limited secondary offering only when the client is declined for the “home” company insurance product. This can be very restrictive for you as a client because “every peg just has to fit in the same hole”. The product, cost of insurance, and approval may not be the best for you – but ultimately, that is the only thing that agent can offer [i.e. sell to you-ed] you so they may try to persuade you to take it no matter what.
Full disclosure: there are great agents who have found the right “profile” or “target market” of potential clients where their offerings fit well and serve the best interest of the client.
Type of Agent and Exclusions, Limitations, and Restrictions
If your agent is trying to get you to accept a policy with one or more exclusions, limitations, and restrictions, you need to wonder – would other quality carriers have the same modifications? Your agent should be able to provide you objective feedback on that question. If you are the person with multiple reconstructive-level knee surgeries, you should know that it is likely that all carriers would operate the same way when it comes to that knee.
What if the modification to your policy is more of a gray area than a black and white example? Is your agent looking to get you the best possible policy (perhaps without the same modification) or are you just discussing the “home team” insurance policy? Remember, while they all operate in the same industry, different insurance companies may view variables differently. “Looking” for better options means that you should have correspondence direct from the other carriers. If the agent lightly mentions the other companies, it could mean that it is time to “dig deeper”.
What if you already purchased a policy that has exclusions, limitations, or restrictions? Is your agent actively looking to get an exclusion reviewed on the predetermined timeline to see if removal is warranted? As the dynamic of the disability insurance marketplace, not just their company, continues to change is your agent staying abreast of opportunities for you as a client? If your exclusion was reviewed and the insurance company kept it in force, would another carrier possibly issue an equivalent policy without the same modification?
The Client/Insured
So, what is the bottom line for you as the policyholder of, or applicant for, disability insurance? (A similar approach should be taken when applying for term life insurance)
Sometimes, an exclusion is an exclusion and the modification to the policy is just going to be there. Insurance agents can research, advocate, and scour the marketplace, but in the end, certain exclusions are warranted. As the policyholder, you now know that options were explored for you, and can make the informed decision of whether to place that modified policy or not.

Does that really look dangerous? Look at all those attachments to the mountain! Look how thick that rope is! Why is this excluded while backcountry skiing and swimming with sharks is not? /rant
If you are dealing with an objective agent:
- They will be professionally firm and help you navigate if a slightly modified offer from Company A truly is better than an offer from Company B that is not modified. Would you take a disability insurance policy that did not protect your own occupation as a surgeon because it excluded a hazardous activity like free climbing? (By the way, all high quality carriers will likely exclude free climbing.)
- They will help you compare carriers, their respective pricing, the contract features & language, and advise you of what best fits you as a client, not them as a person with a sales goal.
- If you flip over their business card and read the fine print, they should be able to cogently explain which company or companies they represent and how they intend to serve you as a client.
In the end, your insurance agent should be sitting on the same side of the table as you – their client, not an insurance company.
[Editor's Note: One other option not mentioned by Mr. Warren is to purposely choose a less than ideal group policy for part or all of your insurance coverage. Group policies available through your employer or professional association may not be portable and may offer less comprehensive coverage, but what they often don't do is ask pesky questions about your health and recreational activities. You may find it less important to have true own-occ coverage, portability, or a high-quality inflation rider than to have your SCUBA diving, anxiety, or knee injury covered. Be sure to discuss ALL your options, even if you have a truly independent agent (who won't get a commission at all if you go with a group policy.) One additional benefit of that group policy is it is likely MUCH cheaper, at least while you are young, allowing you to buy more coverage.]
What do you think? Do you have an exclusion, limitation or restricted rider on your policy? Have you been able to get one removed? What did you choose to do with regards to health issues or dangerous activities? Why do insurance companies always ask about climbing but never about asphyxiation games? Comment below!
I am looking to get disability insurance out of residency fellowship. I have a previous history of ACL/Meniscus injury and surgery (3 total surgeries). Have not had any issues for over 6 years. Would most disability insurance policies completely write off my right knee? For example, if I develop OA in 20 years, is that something that wouldn’t be covered? Or would it only be specific to issues regarding my ACL and meniscus.
I just pasted your comment in an email to underwriters at the carriers that offer own occ DI.
I will reply here when I get an answer.
Sort of shocked.
Got a bunch of carriers that would exclude your knee, but then received this:
Paraphrasing
If the applicant’s height and weight are where they should be, and assuming that there is no arthritis and that at least 1 year has passed with no issues, then we would consider covering the knee in full.
Woah.
I don’t want to put the exact details here out of respect for the company and the person that sent that to me, but there is a chance. Cool. Turn over every stone and sometimes you get a pleasant surprise. No promises of course other than that pushing and pushing is the goal.
Thanks for doing that.
Joe,
I appreciate the help. The biggest question of course would be what their weight cutoff would be (BMI, total weight, etc…) and how they want to verify no arthritis. I haven’t had any imaging in 6 years. However, it sounds like for the most part the entire knee would be excluded. Does anyone know if the insurance companies would consider removal of the rider if I go a significant period of time without having any visits for knee pain?
I wouldn’t count on it. If you’re not having issues, you don’t need a rider. If you are having issues, they don’t want to give it to you!
I find there are a lot of vague “maybe it can be waived in a few years” but the answer above was what I got when I asked about waiving my climbing rider at a time when I hadn’t been climbing in a long time.
Hi Ryan-
These are great follow up questions as well (BMI considerations, the what if’s, etc.)
Each company’s build chart varies so that is a bit tricky to pin down. I don’t like being vague with people but it is not identical across carriers.
Verification of no pain/arthritis – this is a great item to touch on. It will come from a multitude of sources; your answers to the questions asked by the carrier (health, lifestyle, medical history) combined with whatever medical records are reviewed by the carriers.
What if you do end up with an exclusion pertaining to that knee – well, you make sure your agent pushes to ensure that exclusion is “review-able” and gets the carrier to discuss what is necessary (and when) to get the exclusion removed. Basically, what needs to be furnished/demonstrated/documented downstream for the exclusion to be removed.
It is a tricky, and frustrating, road to navigate… no argument there. But, you are on the right track, asking the right questions. My opinion so far is that a strong argument can be made for that knee to not be excluded.
Exclusions are removed but I bet that it would stay on permanently if they apply it from day one. They sometimes use five years as a threshold but we have also gone back in cases where we would expect it to be removed and it is of course not.
There is nothing like the pressure that is created from battling for business. The carrier might issue without the exclusion as part of the play to earn the business. Once it’s on the books, although we could tell them that you are moving to another carrier, I find that the chances of success go down, naturally.
I’m going to get an answer to your follow-up to what I pasted here. This is very interesting.
I am a surgeon with an own-occupation private disability insurance plan from 11 years ago. There is an exclusion for “disorders and diseases of the lumbar spine.” I have been diagnosed with an inflammatory arthritis which affects the entire spine (lumbar, thoracic, cervical, and sacrum), and I am no longer able to stand for long periods in the operating room.
Will the exclusion for a part of the spine (lumbar) result in a denial of benefits for my condition (which affects the entire spine, including lumbar)?
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
I think you’ve asked this question somewhere before. I don’t think this is the right place to ask it. I mean, go ahead and try asking it on the forum, but really you need professional advice from an agent or more likely an attorney. Isn’t it time to file a claim and see what happens with it?
I got latent TB a few months back and am currently taking INH ppx for 9 months. I applied for DI and got coverage with an Infectious cause exclusion that can be “reviewed” after 2 years.
What are the chances this exclusion gets taken off if I remain in good health and finish my antibiotic course?
Low, but not zero. Here’s why- if you are having an issue, why would they take it off. If you’re not having an issue, why would they care? I would, however, try to get them to limit your exclusion to only TB.
Thanks I got an email reply from them saying it is limiited to TB only and if I got 2 years without treatment and have a neg chest x-ray it is “likely” to be changed at that time. I guess we’ll see what likely means.
And no I am not currently having or ever had any symptoms of TB.
Hi, I have a permanent exclusion for low back pain. Is it worthwhile covering that with a group policy on top? I probably should have looked into GSI before, but it’s too late now. Thank you!
That would definitely be a reason to consider layering group LTD on top of your individual policy. You can read more about that in this guest policy https://thephysicianphilosopher.com/2018/11/19/group-disability-insurance or WCI’s post https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/why-i-bought-a-group-disability-insurance-policy/
If you are still in training, you might also want to inquire to see if there are any Guaranteed Standard Issue (GSI) plans available to you as there do not require medical underwriting.
Hi
I have applied for DI and they are excluding both my eyes as i have IOP of 22 and the exclusion says-‘this exclusion is due to ocular hypertension we can offer to review once applicant has routine eye exams, on a regular basis , showing Intraoral at pressure consistently at or below 21’.
I feel this exclusion language is very vague and they want to exclude both my eyes my doctor clearly stated that I do not have any gluocoma nor do I need treatment how to approach this situation ?
I don’t think you have a choice. I’d get the insurance and then try again in a couple of years to remove the exclusion. Tell your doctor about the issue and he/she may be able to help you get the documentation you need. I check IOP all the time and it can vary a bit. I mean, if I check 3 times and get an 18, a 20, and a 22, I might call it 20. But it’s probably legitimate to call it 18 too if there is a good reason like this to do it.
Thank you for getting back ! But when there is no particular time line and just says ‘routine eye exams on regular basis ‘ doesn’t that give the insurance companies an edge to decide what they think would be the right time to remove the exclusion which can be never? In other words is it better to include a time line like 2 exam readings in 24 months ?
You should ask your agent these questions. If they are experienced, I’m confident they’ll be able to help you understand this better.
Reconsiderations are not contractual and will therefore not be included in the exclusion language you see on your final policy. The only thing contractual will be the exclusion itself.
Reconsiderations like this are a simple courtesy the underwriter is offering you and are not obligatory. I understand your interest in knowing a specific time frame, and agree you should ask for one simply so your expectations can be set appropriately. That said, you should understand that the insurance company is not required to make changes in the future and has full discretion to make that decision.
The obvious thought is that insurance companies have no interest in reversing exclusions, but in fact they do. They want to maintain your business and know you’ll go elsewhere if they inappropriately refuse to reconsider. My experience is good with getting exclusions reversed, but it needs to be appropriate.
Ha ha. Sure, but they’re not going to do that because they hold all the cards. Take it or leave it. The good news is that if you really don’t have any significant eye problems, that’s unlikely to be the cause of your disability!