By Eric Rosenberg, WCI Contributor
By Dr. Jim Dahle, WCI Founder
Municipal bonds, or muni bonds, offer a unique method of investing with a considerable tax benefit. Income earned from municipal bonds is typically tax-free on your federal income tax return, giving you an instant boost compared to federal bonds, corporate bonds, and other investments. If you’re looking for a broad fund focused on municipal bonds, you may have come across VWIUX and FMBIX—municipal bond funds from Vanguard and Fidelity, respectively.
However, the two funds are very different, with different minimum investments and expense ratios. Here’s a closer look at VWIUX vs. FMBIX to help you understand which may be better for your investment goals.
What Is a Municipal Bond Fund?
As the name implies, a municipal bond fund is a mutual fund or Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) focused on municipal bond investments. Just like direct municipal bond investments, returns from a muni bond fund are typically tax-exempt at the federal level. That means you can earn a little less than other investments and still see the same effective return, assuming you’re investing in a taxable account.
As with other diverse investment funds, some follow a specific index—such as the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index—while others are actively managed and attempt to beat the market.
Important areas to consider when comparing muni bond funds include the underlying index, the fund’s performance compared to the index and similar funds, and fund fees (expense ratios). When looking at VWIUX vs. FMBIX, we’ll look at these and other features to zero in on the better fund for most white coat investor portfolios.
More information here:
Why Buying Individual Municipal Bonds Doesn’t Boost Your Return Over a Bond Fund
Should I Use a State-Specific Municipal Bond Fund?
What Is VWIUX?
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VWIUX) is an actively managed municipal bond fund from one of the largest fund managers worldwide. As an “Admiral Fund,” Vanguard requires a high minimum investment, but management fees are typically lower with Admiral funds than other Vanguard funds and many competitors.
- Fund name: Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares
- Ticker symbol: VWIUX
- Expense ratio: 0.09%
- Minimum investment: $50,000
When looking at cumulative performance compared to the Bloomberg 1-15 Year Municipal Index, Vanguard’s fund tends to outperform by a percent or two, which can add up to significant gains over a long enough period.
With a hefty minimum investment, however, it’s out of reach for all but high net worth investors. After all, putting too high of a percentage of your taxable investments in municipal bonds likely isn’t the best decision. But if you have a large portfolio where a $50,000 investment is reasonable, VWIUX is a tax-efficient fund that typically beats the index.
For what it's worth, Morningstar gives VWIUX four stars.
What Is FMBIX?
Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMXIX) is a mutual fund that mirrors the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index. Instead of choosing between different municipal bonds, FMBIX managers buy what Bloomberg adds to the index and keep it weighted toward the larger funds, called market cap weighting.
There’s no minimum investment amount, and the expense ratio is low. But its performance may leave something to be desired.
- Fund name: Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund
- Ticker symbol: FMBIX
- Expense ratio: 0.07%
- Minimum investment: $0
If you want to dip your toe in the muni bond waters, FMBIX is an option. You can start small and build a position over time, helping keep your portfolio diversified and weighted the way you want. But performance isn’t a slam dunk. It has trailed its benchmark index since its inception. While it’s relatively cheap, the expense ratio is higher than many other Fidelity index funds. When looking at how all factors—including cost and performance—stack up, we'll call this a mixed bag.
Morningstar gives just one star to FMBIX.
VWIUX vs. FMBIX: Which Should I Choose?
Which should you choose when comparing VWIUX vs. FMBIX? Here’s how they compare when going head to head.

Source: Vanguard and Fidelity, accurate as of August 2024.
Jim has flip-flopped on his message about muni bonds. As he wrote in December 2023:
“In no other area of investing have my views shifted as much as they have on muni bonds . . . My first blog post about muni bonds basically said, “Why bother? Your bonds belong in tax-protected accounts anyway.” When I realized a few years later that, at very low interest rates, it absolutely could make sense to hold bonds in a taxable account so your stocks could grow faster in a tax-protected account, I wrote an extremely controversial post called Bonds Go in Taxable.
Then, due to the evolution of my own portfolio, I was forced to hold at least some of my bonds in a taxable account . . . I went from thinking, “Why would anyone own muni bonds?” to actually having a large and ever-increasing percentage of my bonds in a muni bond fund.
As I write this, 40% of my bonds (and 80% of my nominal bonds) are in a Vanguard muni bond fund with intermediate duration. I use VWIUX (Vanguard Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond Fund) and, after 2022 when it became necessary, I used a very similar tax-loss harvesting partner in VTEAX (the Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond Index Fund).”
VWIUX may technically be actively managed, but given its low costs and low turnover, it might as well be an index fund. Thus, it is no surprise to see in this comparison that the Vanguard fund is about 440 times larger than the Fidelity fund. It has seven times as many securities in it, has a dramatically longer track record, and has outperformed the Fidelity fund for as long as the Fidelity fund has been around. There's a reason VWIUX is in Jim's portfolio (he had never even heard of FMBIX before comparing these two funds for this post).
At any rate, the most important differences between these two funds are found under the hood. FMBIX has a duration of 6.1 years and Vanguard has a duration of 5.5 years. Also, 78% of the bonds in FMBIX are AAA or AA, while only 60% of the bonds in VWIUX are in those top two categories. In essence, Fidelity is taking on more term risk and Vanguard is taking on more credit risk.
Based on performance, VWIUX is a stronger choice for investors with enough cash to meet the hefty minimum. But for everyone else, FMBIX offers a lower hurdle to enter the markets and a slightly lower expense ratio. But, at least in the past, that access came at the cost of performance.
More information here:
How Do You Evaluate and Compare Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds?
Vanguard vs. Fidelity — Which Is Best for Your Investments?
The Nuts and Bolts of Investing
VWIUX vs. FMBIX: Which Is Better?
First, Vanguard is the world's leader when it comes to bond mutual funds. As Jack Bogle pointed out, the most important thing in bond investing is to keep expenses low, because bonds don't return much as it is. Giving up 1% of a 3% return to a fund manager is a monstrous hurdle to overcome. Thus, Vanguard's low-cost approach has proved to be superior over the years, so much so that companies like Fidelity are now trying to emulate it to avoid becoming irrelevant.
If you have $50,000 or more to invest in a taxable investment account, VWIUX is a better option due to the fund’s performance history. While it’s more expensive, the difference in investment results makes it a winner compared to FMBIX.
Plus, the high minimum investment is easy to work around, and it shouldn't even be considered much of a drawback. For example, VWIUX is the Admiral share class. There is also an Investor share class for this fund with a minimum investment of $3,000. If that's a problem for you, why are you investing in muni bonds in the first place? While not technically designed for high net worth investors, they are designed for high-income investors who have significant assets above and beyond retirement accounts, which usually means high net worth. While $3,000 is still more than the minimum Fidelity investment, Vanguard has another muni bond fund with an intermediate duration, VTEAX (which Jim also uses as a tax-loss harvesting partner for VWIUX, although the VTEAX duration is 6.4 years with 79% of bonds in the two highest credit categories). That one is technically an index fund, but more importantly, it also has an ETF share class (VTEB) with a minimum investment of one share, about $50. So, there's no reason to go to Fidelity for your bond funds just to get a lower minimum investment.
While we're sure the Fidelity fund is fine to use and that it will grow over time, Vanguard deserves its crown when it comes to bond funds. If you want the older established fund, use VWIUX. If you want one with a longer duration and better quality, use VTEAX. If you need a very low minimum investment with the lowest possible fees, use VTEB. We see no role at all for FMBIX unless your account is captive at Fidelity for some reason and you have an aversion to using ETFs.
In need of help on your financial journey? Over the years, The White Coat Investor has carefully curated a recommended list of professionals who have been thoroughly vetted and trusted by thousands of readers. Explore our handpicked selections today, and get the exceptional support you deserve.
Do you invest in muni bond funds? Do you prefer VWIUX or FMBIX? Why? Have you considered switching?
One might instead of VWIUX consider a comparison of VWITX to the Fidelity fund because it is more similar to FMBIX in minimal investment. I certainly agree with your conclusion that the Vanguard fund has performed better but would recommend that anyone in a high tax state or municipality chooses a state-specific muni bond fund because the additional local tax exemption can make a significant difference in overall return.
One of the surprising things about intermediate term muni bond funds is that they hold lots of bonds with very long maturities. For VWITX/VWIUX around 45% of the portfolio has a maturity of greater than 10 years and around 3% greater than 20 years. For FMBIX over 50% matures after more than 10 years and a surprising 20% at over 20 years. I suspect that this over-allocation to very long munis in FMBIX is one of the reasons for its underperformance (it had similar allocation before interest rates rose and cratered long term bond values). In contrast a taxable intermediate bond fund like VBILX has maybe 2% of its portfolio with a maturity of over 10 years. This difference illustrates the fact that muni bond funds require active management and the average duration needs to be taken with a grain of salt because it doesn’t account for the negative convexity of muni bond funds. It is also probably not best to describe FMBIX as a fund that ” mirrors the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index”. That index has all investment-grade munis over 1 year in maturity and Fidelity calls it the benchmark for FMBIX but it is almost impossible for a muni bond fund to truly duplicate an index and I don’t think FMBIX can do anything beyond trying to replicate its returns.
It’s important to compare apples to apples. Most performance differences can be explained with variations in bond quality and maturity.
Does anyone use VWALX (High Yield Tax Exempt Fund)…in addition to VWIUX for their municipal bonds? I personally have found this to be a main leg of in my 3 fund portfolio which provids a very reasonable amount of municipal bond exposure return but excellent yield with only a mild rise in risk (in an asset meant to provide safety). Just curious on others thoughts.
I don’t. While Vanguard’s junk bond funds aren’t as junky as many, I prefer to keep quality pretty darn high for my bonds and take my risk on the equity side where I think it is better compensated and more tax-efficient. So my bonds are pretty safe.
I chose VWALX over VWIUX myself. Higher risk profile but higher return historically. Got bit hard during the COVID crash and still recovering. But it’s meeting my expecations.
How do interest rate cuts affect muni bond funds? I’m helping manage my 92 year old mom’s investments and the bond funds sound appealing but I’m not not knowledgeable enough on if share prices fall in lower Fed rates. Part of me says initially they should rise since higher rate bonds are owned but not sure medium term. What has been your experience?
Same as other bond funds. The bonds in the fund become worth more and NAV goes up. Bond prices fall when interest rates rise and vice versa. In the long run, periods of time longer than duration of the fund, higher rates are actually better for long term investors, all else being equal.
Thank you for taking time to respond. Very helpful!
Municipal bonds are generally “callable” (some years after issuance) which means that the municipality can elect to pay the bond off early. That means they rise a little less in price when interest rates fall when compared to noncallable bonds and in extreme cases, such as when the bond is trading above its par value, might even fall in value. A fund will contain a large number of bonds so the effect might be somewhat muted but this creates “negative convexity” because a bond with a higher rate is more likely to be called if interest rates fall while when interest rates rise the bonds’ effective duration increases because the likelihood of early repayment decreases.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/negative_convexity.asp
What Vanguard bond fund would you prefer in your tax-protected account? I’ve got most in VBTLX.
We invest in the TSP G fund in the TSP, SCHP in other accounts and then the Vanguard intermediate muni fund and individual I bonds and TIPS in taxable. But it’s REALLY hard to go wrong with Vanguard bonds funds. They’re uniformly excellent and low cost and well run. VBTLX is a great fund. So is VBILX (my parents use this). VAIPX is good if you want TIPS. They have good short term, treasury, corporate, and junk funds too.
What kind of bonds do you want? Answer that you’ll then easily be able to pick which Vanguard fund to use.
Doc — I’m still confused with how you think about allocation within bonds for docs still in wealth generation phase (we are late to the game, early 40s, kids, just starting to earn well now). I have a bond question, but here is our current portfolio (not included is 529s and cash).
– 90% equities (VTI/VXUS in vanguard, TSP C fund, BTC Equity W 401k)
– 5% bonds (50% is in FXNAX in a 457b, and 50% is in TSP G fund)
-3.5% real estate (VNQ, in roth)
-1.5% speculative (in roth)
Big Question: because we started late, we have very little roth space and little 401k space), a non qualified 457b is new for me this year. We currently have net worth of ~900K. In our TSP we have 80% allocated to TSP C fund and 20% allocated to TSP G fund. As we continue to invest in our taxable account, should we slowly convert C fund to G fund to maintain our 5% bond allocation? Said differently, let’s say in 2-3 years we’ve upped our bond allocation to 10%… should we get to a point where we’ve converted our TSP to entirely G fund to cover that bond allocation? And once we’ve maxed that, then we move on to something like VTEB in our taxable once we run out of room? Because the reality is the little roth space we have is for VNQ, we do have a non qualified 457b now, but my choices are limited so we are putting that 23,500 this year into FXNAX (I could do FXAIX / FTIHX in it, but we are hitting our equities goal allocation through our taxable).
Sorry for the convoluted question, happy to clarify if you have additional questions. Thank you!
p.s. basically it’s a sequencing question for me. how do I fill up the bond allocation with my roth spaces already accounted for. that leaves me a TSP and a 457b and a taxable. so, do I max out TSP G first (at the cost of shifting my C fund equities into G fund), to get to my 5% bond, but as my net worth grows, then do I consider VTEB (or similar muni) in taxable? Then do I consider every year doing my 23,500 for 457b into FXNAX? While my 401k 23,500 continues to go into BTC Equity Index W?
Thanks!!
As we continue to invest in our taxable account, should we slowly convert C fund to G fund to maintain our 5% bond allocation?
Sure, I did that.
Said differently, let’s say in 2-3 years we’ve upped our bond allocation to 10%… should we get to a point where we’ve converted our TSP to entirely G fund to cover that bond allocation?
Yup, you said it differently and that’s what happened to me too. And then I neede even more bonds than I had TSP space.
And once we’ve maxed that, then we move on to something like VTEB in our taxable once we run out of room?
Sure sounds a lot like my portfolio. But you should read this post for more nuance: https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/asset-location/
It’s also okay to put your bonds into a Roth IRA despite what people say about it. Technically you should just put less in there. But I’d do FXNAX in the 457b first for sure.