I know there have been many discussions on this that I’ve read through but I’d like to hear opinions on specifically whether it would ever make sense to do an ARM if there’s a reasonable chance that I would be in the house longer than the initial fixed period and I’m not 100% sure I’d pay it off during the fixed period.
I’m a very new attending and have better uses for my money for the next 3-4 years than paying a mortgage early (currently paying down 300k in student loans over 3-4 years and will obviously max all retirement accounts and more to get to 20%). By the time either of these ARMs end, I would be looking at a significantly higher income than now (if still in the house, that means I’m still at this job and partner salaries are high 6-figure to low 7-figure). I believe the max rate would be 5% higher than the initial rate though if I’m still in the loan, I imagine I’d probably want to just refinance.
Currently looking at these rates:
7/1 ARM: 3.125% with ~$500 credit
10/1 ARM: 3.25%
30-year fixed 3.75% ~$100 fee
Thank you!!June 18, 2019 at 2:59 pm MST #223159jfoxcpacfpModeratorStatus: Financial Advisor, Accountant, Small Business OwnerPosts: 8137Joined: 01/09/2016
That 10/1 ARM looks pretty appealing, given what you’ve provided, but at these rates, I’d be ok with either that or the 30-yr fixed. Going with 10 instead of 7 just gives you some breathing space and makes me more comfortable.
Yeah that was my initial thought…those could be a valuable 3 years where I’d be at a much higher income and therefore if rates spike and I know I’ll be facing a big increase, I’d be able to aggressively pay the mortgage during that time.June 18, 2019 at 3:05 pm MST #223161ENT DocParticipantStatus: PhysicianPosts: 3518Joined: 01/14/2017
10/1 ARM is reasonable. Huntington has a 15/1 ARM product for physicians as well. The ARM is fine as long as you plan on doing one of two things IMO – paying it off early, or refinancing.June 18, 2019 at 3:09 pm MST #223166wonka31ParticipantStatus: PhysicianPosts: 701Joined: 03/24/2018
What’s the quoted rate on a 15 year fixed? I fee that would help determine whether or not the 10yr ARM makes sense.June 18, 2019 at 3:24 pm MST #223171ENT DocParticipantStatus: PhysicianPosts: 3518Joined: 01/14/2017
Depends on who you get as an agent, your credit, assets, jumbo vs non-jumbo, assets, income, and state. Hard to give a definite % but should be between the 30 and 10/1.June 18, 2019 at 3:31 pm MST #223176PedsModeratorStatus: PhysicianPosts: 4447Joined: 01/08/2016BmacParticipantStatus: PhysicianPosts: 313Joined: 10/21/2017
Wait… Or not buy a house yet…Click to expand…
Ding, ding, ding . . . and we have a winner.
What about my situation in particular makes you say that? I’ve been a long time reader here and can usually quickly pick out the posts where someone shouldn’t buy a house and I just don’t see it here. Maybe I’m blinded by it being me though…
-Job is one I’m very familiar with and I know I get along with all doctors and staff
-moving back to hometown to be near my and wife’s families
-don’t see any way we’re here less than 10 years, more likely forever
-house is 1.25-1.5x base salary, likely 1x total income and is in a neighborhood we lovePedsModeratorStatus: PhysicianPosts: 4447Joined: 01/08/2016
True – sorry about any confusion.
I’ll be able to afford the mortgage and a student loan payment that gets me done with them in 4 years but I just want the loans gone so any extra cash that I have (after maxing retirement accounts of course) I’d prefer to put towards student loans rather than extra mortgage payments until the student loans are gone.June 18, 2019 at 4:08 pm MST #223197TimParticipantStatus: AccountantPosts: 3079Joined: 09/18/2018
Okay, so you employment isn’t a “blind date”.
When is the partnership? It sounds like a sweet situation, but buying the house in like an engagement. I would consider holding off until the partnership is solidified. You can afford to wait. Sometimes things turn out differently. Hope the neighborhood doesn’t disappear, pretty sure it won’t. Owning vs renting certainly won’t hurt you at all for a couple years.
Not a recommendation, just another path to consider. It is a reasonable option.jhwkr542ParticipantStatus: PhysicianPosts: 1316Joined: 02/15/2016
Getting back to the topic at hand, I’d do the 30 year for the insurance. 10/1 would be ok but you’d have to pay off quickly or refinance later, but no guarantee rates will be that low still.StarTrekDocParticipantStatus: PhysicianPosts: 2055Joined: 01/15/2017
Hard to tell right now. Back in 2009 few thought we’d still be hanging around in low interest rate territory. We’ve never seen things this low and we’re entering a decade of recovery. So due soon with the inversion curve peeking its head every so often lately. I wonder if the Japan stagnation for a ‘decade’ will be coming….of course we don’t save like them so doubt deflation would be an issue—just stagnation.
So 10ARM isn’t really a bad bet at this stage if this is all coming to pass.June 19, 2019 at 1:09 am MST #223299ajm184ParticipantStatus: Other ProfessionalPosts: 637Joined: 07/14/2017
Historical (albeit limited) data suggests using an ARM is a better financial decision. Given average home ownership at a given location is 7’ish years, it intuitively makes sense for use of an ARM. A couple of issues with an ARM including the future unknown rate environment; don’t want to be on the wrong end of 10%+ rate reset. Also, given the slow demise of LIBOR as rate resetting mechanism within ARM’s, the question becomes the effectiveness of alternative future rate setting metric upon which ARM’s would be based.